What is?

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

How do they endanger children's development?

Kids need to see faces for multiple reasons, such as learning to talk. Don't take my word for it; do a quick web search. Kids are developing autism-like behaviors.

 

[SlugButter]

Kids need to see faces for multiple reasons, such as learning to talk. Don't take my word for it; do a quick web search. Kids are developing autism-like behaviors.

Rob hates deaf people and children. He once ate a child while forcing a deaf Asian to sing “it ain’t easy being green” in Laotian. It was disgusting. He has no care for things if he can see the lips…..

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

As I have said before. You don't need to speak for me. I am not an "anti-vaxer" and I never said I don't trust these entities when it comes to the existing COVID vaccines. I never said I trust anyone else over them either. You really have to stop grouping everyone with opinions, facts or other all into the same group if they chose to not be democrats or liberals.

The NIH AND WHO state the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID... then say not to use it because there is not enough data. How do they know it's effective then? Either they do have data or they don't, which is it? They know WAAAAAYYYYYYY more about Ivermectin then they do the current vaccines as it has been used for a very long time alllllllllllllll around the world.

What you shared indicates the FLCCA (not a recognized medical body on the world stage, or any stage for that matter) has stated the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID, and that the NIH & WHO say ivermectin is good against parasites.

Where are the NIH, WHO, CDC, etc. studies that show the efficacy of ivermection against COVID? Can you share some links, or somehting?

This is what the NIH website has right now:

• There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.

This is what the WHO website has right now:

• The current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive. Until more data is available, WHO recommends that the drug only be used within clinical trials.This recommendation, which applies to patients with COVID-19 of any disease severity, is now part of WHO’s guidelines on COVID-19 treatments.
  Ivermectin is a broad spectrum anti-parasitic agent, included in WHO essential medicines list for several parasitic diseases. It is used in the treatment of onchocerciasis (river blindness), strongyloidiasis and other diseases caused by soil transmitted helminthiasis. It is also used to treat scabies
  
  maybe I'm confused, but these do not seem like statements that ivermectin is efficacious in preventing or treating COVID.
  
  
  
  
  
  

 

[Jesus Christ]

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

What you shared indicates the FLCCA (not a recognized medical body on the world stage, or any stage for that matter) has stated the efficacy of ivermectin against COVID, and that the NIH & WHO say ivermectin is good against parasites.

Where are the NIH, WHO, CDC, etc. studies that show the efficacy of ivermection against COVID? Can you share some links, or somehting?

This is what the NIH website has right now:

• There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Results from adequately powered, well-designed, and well-conducted clinical trials are needed to provide more specific, evidence-based guidance on the role of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.

This is what the WHO website has right now:

• The current evidence on the use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 patients is inconclusive. Until more data is available, WHO recommends that the drug only be used within clinical trials.This recommendation, which applies to patients with COVID-19 of any disease severity, is now part of WHO’s guidelines on COVID-19 treatments.
  Ivermectin is a broad spectrum anti-parasitic agent, included in WHO essential medicines list for several parasitic diseases. It is used in the treatment of onchocerciasis (river blindness), strongyloidiasis and other diseases caused by soil transmitted helminthiasis. It is also used to treat scabies
  
  maybe I'm confused, but these do not seem like statements that ivermectin is efficacious in preventing or treating COVID.
  
  
  
  
  

Do you know why you won't go find it, and they both stated what I posted? You don't want to find it. You are only interested in what you can find that is against what someone else states. It almost like it is a contest for you. So and so said this... Let me see if I can find a post, ANY post, that says it isn't true!!! We get it, there is always going to be someone, somebody that will state the opposite. You don't have to be the one who constantly makes sure everyone knows it. We already know it.

Cool that what you posted is on their website now... cool. It doesn't change that they said it works then said don't use it. That's the wonderful thing about the internet, once it is out there, it is out there.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Kids need to see faces for multiple reasons, such as learning to talk. Don't take my word for it; do a quick web search. Kids are developing autism-like behaviors.

I Googled it, and the "brief" of every single result (from accredited groups) on the first page says that masks are not causing harm.
What am I missing? Should I be checking with Joe Rogan or Tucker Carlson for their studies?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Do you know why you won't go find it, and they both stated what I posted? You don't want to find it. You are only interested in what you can find that is against what someone else states. It almost like it is a contest for you. So and so said this... Let me see if I can find a post, ANY post, that says it isn't true!!! We get it, there is always going to be someone, somebody that will state the opposite. You don't have to be the one who constantly makes sure everyone knows it. We already know it.

Cool that what you posted is on their website now... cool. It doesn't change that they said it works then said don't use it. That's the wonderful thing about the internet, once it is out there, it is out there.

No. I literally posted quotes direct from THEIR websites what they say about ivermectin and COVID. Not from Instagram, or Facebook, or Snapchat, or a conspiracy website. FROM the NIH and WHO websites.

Are you suggesting there are hidden/secret studies or documents that the NIH and WHO have performed that say ivermection is good for COVID, but they are lying on their website about it?
If they posted that it works and that the word is "out there", I challenge you to share it here. You should have no problem finding it b/c you know it exists and you know exactly what to search for. My searches do not give the evidence you claim.

I'd like to see proof of both agencies doing so, but at least ONE would be a totally fair request if you insist it is true.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Rob hates deaf people and children. He once ate a child while forcing a deaf Asian to sing “it ain’t easy being green” in Laotian. It was disgusting. He has no care for things if he can see the lips…..

Going to take about ten minutes just to build that scene in my imagination. A whole lot to unpack and assemble there.
Like a piece of Ikea furniture.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

No. I literally posted quotes direct from THEIR websites what they say about ivermectin and COVID.

Are you suggesting there are hidden/secret studies or documents that the NIH and WHO have performed that say ivermection is good for COVID, but they are lying on their website about it?

If they posted that it works and that the word is "out there", I challenge you to share it here. You should have no problem finding it b/c you know it exists and you know exactly what to search for.

I'd like to see proof of both agencies doing so, but at least ONE would be a totally fair request if you insist it is true.

I read where both the WHO and NIH stated the efficacy of Ivermectin against COVID, which was positive, and then later they said but don't use it, there isn't enough data. I don't have to "find it", I read it already. I didn't say the the word is "out there" I stated that once something is said on the internet it is always on the internet. God damn it gets tiring explaining shit because you people refuse to comprehend anything. Phuck!

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I read where both the WHO and NIH stated the efficacy of Ivermectin against COVID, which was positive, and then later they said but don't use it, there isn't enough data. I don't have to "find it", I read it already. I didn't say the the word is "out there" I stated that once something is said on the internet it is always on the internet. God damn it gets tiring explaining shit because you people refuse to comprehend anything. Phuck!

Yes, and I read that a UFO picked a guy up and sang to him, then returned him to earth in a crop circle.
My statement is not really something you'd accept as proof of extraterrestrials, is it?

"once something is said on the internet it is always on the internet"
"Out there" is a phrase (not quite a euphemism) that says the same thing. Like "The truth is out there". It means it exists somewhere. In your case, you claim the proof is "out there" on the interwebs. Which means you can get it and share it here to give credibility to your claim. Otherwise, your claim is merely a fabrication to support your narrative.

In my case, there is no proof of the UFO incident, so my claim has no credibility here.

 

[Jesus Christ]

so my claim has no credibility here

All your claims/posts have lost all credibilty..... you claim you dont support democrats but yet defend them passionately and aggressively on a daily basis....so why should anybody on here believe a known liar "you"

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Yes, and I read that a UFO picked a guy up and sang to him, then returned him to earth in a crop circle.
My statement is not really something you'd accept as proof of extraterrestrials, is it?

"once something is said on the internet it is always on the internet"
"Out there" is a phrase (not quite a euphemism) that says the same thing. Like "The truth is out there". It means it exists somewhere. In your case, you claim the proof is "out there" on the interwebs. Which means you can get it and share it here to give credibility to your claim. Otherwise, your claim is merely a fabrication to support your narrative.

In my case, there is no proof of the UFO incident, so my claim has no credibility here.

I don't care if you accept what I posted as proof, fact or truth.

Once again, I told you EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT. You again want to take it however you take things and then tell me what I meant. I literally said, "ONCE IT IS SAID ON THE INTERNET, IT IS ALWAYS ON THE INTERNET". Are we clear?

Again, I don't care if you can't accept what I posted as proof, fact or truth.

"the UFO incident" that is vague. To say "the UFO incident" would be to insinuate that there has in all time only been one UFO incident. So no, your claim holds no water. However, what I posted was what I read. I don't have a need in my head to make sure I prove it to you or my head will explode. I am sorry your head works that way. If you want to read what I read, it's on the internet, go find it, I am not 411.

 

[SlugButter]

Going to take about ten minutes just to build that scene in my imagination. A whole lot to unpack and assemble there.
Like a piece of Ikea furniture.

IKEA!?!? You goddamn communist cheap furniture loving h0m0.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

All your claims/posts have lost all credibilty..... you claim you dont support democrats but yet defend them passionately and aggressively on a daily basis....so why should anybody on here believe a known liar "you"

Hmmm, you think that calling out lies and pointing out truths is “taking sides”? Interesting.
I suppose when your TV breaks, it is because it’s is angry at you?

If Biden starts spewing lies like Trump did, I’d gladly play the bullisht card. Until then..,

Truly, you think like a child. Grow up.
Speaking of credibility, you lost yours when you pussied out and gave my number to a real estate broker. Sissy.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

IKEA!?!? You goddamn communist cheap furniture loving h0m0.

Who said I own it? More assumptions on your part. You live by assumption and feelings, huh?
No thanks. I’ll take proof and facts.