What is?

Status
Not open for further replies.
the fact that you waste time to dig up this BS to try and win an argument is hilarious.......i love trolling passionate extreme left wing democrats.....:ROFLMAO:
Only in a conservatives mind would gathering evidence and comparing different sources be equal to "digging up bullshit"...

Go ahead and dig up some non-BS and present it to me.
 
I originally said "every local/national health department of every country on earth publishing biased data about the effectiveness of the covid vaccine"

You then claimed it was not a conspiracy, but then started talking about stocks? (Ironic as you are telling me to stay on topic)

Then you said I was arguing a strawman despite staying consistent the entire time and asking you to prove your claim that it isn't a conspiracy. I made the statement, and never modified or added to it...
I commented on government officials and their family members... you then jumped into your post, I said MY POST is not a conspiracy. You have to read and follow along. Ok, I chickens to feed and other important things to do.
 
Ivermectin has been approved for human use for years. Many real doctors have prescribed it for Covid. Idk how well it works, but a lot of doctors have said good things about it, and a lot of individuals have used it with some success, some haven’t had success. Your emotional hatred towards ivermectin is programmed psychosis through media orchestrated by intelligence agencies, and paid for by big pharma (the ones profiting off vaccine-only treatment). If you hate ivermectin, then honk your red nose, because you’re a clown.
Except if they suggested Ivermectin as a prevention or cure without properly testing, y'all would be screaming that they were trying to shrink your testicles, magnetize you, and turn you into 5G towers.

They specifically recommended AGAINST Ivermectin use b/c there was not enough science to back up that specific use.
Pick an argument and ride with it. Stop changing to suit the narrative you want to achieve.
 
Okay:




There are hundreds of quotes like this ^^^

Again, how the **** would Pfizer even have first party statistics on deaths/hospitalization vax vs no vax?
Yeah. That’s not actually what I meant, but I’m sure they’re real numbers. How things are counted does matter though. The way hospitals are funded isn’t corrupt, but the way they count things isn’t a good gauge on vaccine efficacy though. If a person with Covid goes to the hospital because they are having heart problems, the hospital has to use resources to treat them for Covid and get paid back by the government for costs associated with treating Covid. Even if the person died of a heart problem that already existed. Its not corrupt, it’s just the way it’s funded, but not a good way to judge vaccine efficacy. It does look apparent that unvaccinated people die more often though. The vaccine doesn’t seem to work as well on the omicron variant. It doesn’t make sense to force a vaccine mandate that will cost a ton of money if the vaccine doesn’t stop the spread like we thought it would. I’m not for a mandate anyway in all honesty, but now it really doesn’t make sense, there are probably 50 million people we would have to violently force into taking the vaccine. Is that really what we want?
 
Yeah. That’s not actually what I meant, but I’m sure they’re real numbers. How things are counted does matter though. The way hospitals are funded isn’t corrupt, but the way they count things isn’t a good gauge on vaccine efficacy though. If a person with Covid goes to the hospital because they are having heart problems, the hospital has to use resources to treat them for Covid and get paid back by the government for costs associated with treating Covid. Even if the person died of a heart problem that already existed. Its not corrupt, it’s just the way it’s funded, but not a good way to judge vaccine efficacy. It does look apparent that unvaccinated people die more often though. The vaccine doesn’t seem to work as well on the omicron variant. It doesn’t make sense to force a vaccine mandate that will cost a ton of money if the vaccine doesn’t stop the spread like we thought it would. I’m not for a mandate anyway in all honesty, but now it really doesn’t make sense, there are probably 50 million people we would have to violently force into taking the vaccine. Is that really what we want?
I agree with some and disagree with some of what you've said. I don't think anyone on this forum supports a complete mandate. I would only support a mandate for certain jobs if the vaccine prevented transmission, but as we now know, it does not.
 
I agree with some and disagree with some of what you've said. I don't think anyone on this forum supports a complete mandate. I would only support a mandate for certain jobs if the vaccine prevented transmission, but as we now know, it does not.
A lot of where my distrust stems from is the government and big pharma past record. These companies have pulled some dirty business in the past and the government helped them. I was all for a single payer health care system specifically for this reason. I have serious doubts that this is only about public health at this point. Record profits could have something to do with it.
 
Nope. You may BELIEVE it, but that’s the perfect example of why feelings and beliefs are not a great way to support an argument.
Correct me then. You gave a very vague description of your occupation. You heavily implied that you're a lawyer, obviously because you view that as a prestigious title, but you didn't list your actual occupation. This is the internet, where everyone has a self-reported nine incher, so I assume you glorified your role. I believe you work in a legal role, but I think you're a paper pusher.

Before you ask: No, I won't read through your entire catalog of garbage to find the post. If your posts had substance, you wouldn't have racked them up like you're competing with sloride.
 
Correct me then. You gave a very vague description of your occupation. You heavily implied that you're a lawyer, obviously because you view that as a prestigious title, but you didn't list your actual occupation. This is the internet, where everyone has a self-reported nine incher, so I assume you glorified your role. I believe you work in a legal role, but I think you're a paper pusher.

Before you ask: No, I won't read through your entire catalog of garbage to find the post. If your posts had substance, you wouldn't have racked them up like you're competing with sloride.
I did no such thing. I very clearly stated exactly what I do for a living and there was a good bit of discussion about it. No glorification AT ALL.

Several dipshits somehow twisted it into a bad thing, and attempted to use the word”rat” as a pejorative, likely because they don’t understand what I do, or they want to appear rebellious and “against the man” (refer to your statement where everyone self-reports a nine-incher). Internet tough guys.

I was clear but did not give excess detail, because there are weirdos like fakeJesus, who would probably try to get some weird revenge for the discussion here (like fakeJesus did).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Clifff150

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
Clifff150
Joined
Location
Texas
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
19,273
Views
807,475
Last reply date
Last reply from
administrator
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top