Winners only.

[SlugButter]

Biden is the greatest man to ever sit in the office of the presidency however. I mean, come on man. He is so coherent with his plans, I don’t see how you guys don’t understand it. How do you cross a bridge in a snow storm without his infrastructure plan that enriches corporate America for things that aren’t bridges? I mean, it’s pretty obvious what his plan is. The border……just don’t look there. It’s working for those migrants just fine. Ask a liberal and they will politely explain where all that money went to. I’m sure they’ve done tons of research on it. I just don’t understand why you aren’t convinced that corporations who made 100 billion dollars that didn’t get taxed can fund 2 trillion dollar plans. I mean, the math is totally there. Ask a liberal, they will lay it all out in great detail. Isn’t that right Rob? Bobby?

 

[SlugButter]

It's sad that some people think that this guy is our greatest President ever!

View attachment 33695

I have literally never heard anyone say that. What kind of people do you hang around with?

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nah. You ignore context even after the context is explained to you.

Show me 20,000 proven lies said by Trump as President.

So, your context is that you feel the list (the one that you feel doesn’t exist in the first place) is bogus.

You won’t accept a random sampling of the lies with verification, you want all 20,000+ lies listed and then proved that he said them.
Because even if a random sampling is shown to be correct, the entire list is bogus without proof of every example.

Good logic there.
Still not willing to meet on the middle and do a random sample? I’m confident you’d say anything I provided is bullshlt, yet you will not do your own verification.
That’s a pretty easy out when you think about it. Kind of a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation.
There is a 13.7mb cab file of the whole thing. Would you even look at it, or still insist that no such list exists?

Here is an interesting watch about a 9/11 lie he made. It includes audio of him speaking the lie. He was “there when it happened”, though there is no evidence and no witnesses. He lost “hundreds” ( or at least “many”) friends that day.

This link offers some insight about his heroic work at ground zero the following days. Though there is no record of it:

Anyone remember his claims of people celebrating in the streets that day? Yeah, I do.

How about all those claims of the best economy In history that were complete lies?
Don’t give me your lame excuse that we “should know” what his words actually mean. That bullshlt doesn’t cut it with me, especially not from a POTUS.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I’m sure it can be counted to look any way you want probably. I’m sure they counted things he said in campaign speeches 86 times as a lie, even though it was the same exact phrase. Here is what I do know. When I listened to Trump speak I would just cringe at how arrogant his mannerisms were. I would cringe when he would exaggerate the truth. I would cringe when he called people names and mocked them (even though it was absolutely hilarious). I cringed when he marched corporate leaders into his political campaigns and administration. He kind of wants to be hated on purpose. He feeds off it I think, much like some sports players feed of negative crowd energy at away games. I think Donald Trump is an interesting character in pop culture and Hollywood, I think he was a horrible president.

They only counted a lie once if repeated in the same venue.

If I tell the same lie to 15 different groups, have I lied once, or have I lied multiple times?
I’ll also ask this: if I tell the same lie multiple times under oath, have I committed perjury once, or multiple times?

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

If you don't know why I'm posting this then maybe you should read a book or two. Yes, I know that's not going to happen.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

So, your context is that you feel the list (the one that you feel doesn’t exist in the first place) is bogus.

Since there is no question mark I can assume you are, yet again, telling me what I think or feel. Mostly because I never said one word of this, secondly, the lack of the question mark.

You won’t accept a random sampling of the lies with verification, you want all 20,000+ lies listed and then proved that he said them.
Because even if a random sampling is shown to be correct, the entire list is bogus without proof of every example.

You are 100% correct.

Good logic there.
Still not willing to meet on the middle and do a random sample? I’m confident you’d say anything I provided is bullshlt, yet you will not do your own verification.
That’s a pretty easy out when you think about it. Kind of a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation.
There is a 13.7mb cab file of the whole thing. Would you even look at it, or still insist that no such list exists?

I am not willing to "meet in the middle". Your claim that the list is factual so prove it. Once more, I never said there is no list.


How about all those claims of the best economy In history that were complete lies?
Don’t give me your lame excuse that we “should know” what his words actually mean. That bullshlt doesn’t cut it with me, especially not from a POTUS.

Who told you those claims were lies? I didn't say "should know" I said comprehension and context and not every word spoken or in text has to be the dictionary definition of the word because CONTEXT MATTERS. It's all good though. I now know what the problem is. You take everything literally because you are not capable of comprehending the context of things said either to you or in general. Here, an example for proof. Just for you lil fella.

RobGMN, you are without a doubt the smartest person on this forum and on the internet. I look forward to every single time you tell me what I really mean in my post and I appreciate the opportunities for learning you give all of us.

See, the context is that the entire previous statement is 100% sarcasm and though YOU would take it as 100% true it is in fact 100% bullshiit.

Expand the above...

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Expand the above...

Do you even realize that you accused me of creating my own context by taking your typed words literally, and then when I accepted your self-claimed “meaning”, you got mad at THAT also?
WHICH do you want? You words taken literally, or your clarified “meaning” taken literally. Or do you just want everything you type regarded as babble that has no meaning at all?
YOU are the one who said that your use of “sure” did not really mean “sure”. Make up your mind, dude!

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Do you even realize that you accused me of creating my own context by taking your typed words literally, and then when I accepted your self-claimed “meaning”, you got mad at THAT also?
WHICH do you want? You words taken literally, or your clarified “meaning” taken literally. Or do you just want everything you type regarded as babble that has no meaning at all?
YOU are the one who said that your use of “sure” did not really mean “sure”. Make up your mind, dude!

None of this response has ANYTHING to do with my response. Dude.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

None of this response has ANYTHING to do with my response. Dude.

You’re either joking, or drunk off your @ss. Literally the first words in your response to me: “Since there is no question mark I can assume you are, yet again, telling me what I think or feel. Mostly because I never said one word of this, secondly, the lack of the question mark.”
You are accusing me of of telling you what you think or feel, AFTER YOU POSTED WHAT YOU THINK OR FEEL WHEN USING A WORD THAT YOU DON’T THINK SHOULD BE TAKEN LITERALLY!
You argued that you didn’t use the word “sure” as it is defined. You said you meant it like “I might know, but not definitely” (my paraphrase). I accepted that explanation, but now you say I’m making up the explanation too? What the actual fvck is wrong with you?
You don’t want your words taken literally, and you don’t want your explained meaning taken literally either. Wow.

As for never claiming there IS no list, I’ll help you with some simple and very commonly used things called QUOTATION MARKS. When you put quotes or “air quotes” in spoken language around a word (usually a noun), you are inferring that the noun is not real. As in “Show us your “deadly” karate skills, tough guy”. The quotes are your inference that there is nothing deadly at all. Or maybe this is easier: “Show me your “600 watt” EQ/booster from WalMart that costs thirty dollars”. The inference is that the 600 watts doesn’t exist.

You asked to see the “list”, which is inferring it does not exist.
No, this is not interpretation of your words. It is how the English language is used. If you really don’t understand this stuff, maybe take a night course. It’s 5th grade level material.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

“I’m Joe Cornpopholio, I need TP for my bunghole.”

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You’re either joking, or drunk off your @ss. Literally the first words in your response to me: “Since there is no question mark I can assume you are, yet again, telling me what I think or feel. Mostly because I never said one word of this, secondly, the lack of the question mark.”
You are accusing me of of telling you what you think or feel, AFTER YOU POSTED WHAT YOU THINK OR FEEL WHEN USING A WORD THAT YOU DON’T THINK SHOULD BE TAKEN LITERALLY!
You argued that you didn’t use the word “sure” as it is defined. You said you meant it like “I might know, but not definitely” (my paraphrase). I accepted that explanation, but now you say I’m making up the explanation too? What the actual fvck is wrong with you?

As for never claiming there IS no list, I’ll help you with some simple and very commonly used things called QUOTATION MARKS. When you put quotes or “air quotes” in spoken language around a word (usually a noun), you are inferring that the noun is not real. As in “Show us your “deadly” karate skills, tough guy”. The quotes are your inference that there is nothing deadly at all. Or maybe this is easier: “Show me your “600 watt” EQ/booster from WalMart that costs thirty dollars”. The inference is that the 600 watts doesn’t exist.

You asked to see the “list”, which is inferring it does not exist.
No, this is not interpretation of your words. It is how the English language is used. If you really don’t understand this stuff, maybe take a night course. It’s 5th grade level material.

Oh trust me, I am fine. My argument is not in the use of the word "sure." The word "sure" was and is irrelevant in my post. You and you alone made it the focus. The focus should have been the context in which the statement was made. This context is what you missed. It's ok. Thank you yet again for the learning opportunities and the corrections you give which help all of us be better people. You are truly a great person. I am sure I will sleep better tonight with all the educational guidance you have given... yet again.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

You’re either joking, or drunk off your @ss. Literally the first words in your response to me: “Since there is no question mark I can assume you are, yet again, telling me what I think or feel. Mostly because I never said one word of this, secondly, the lack of the question mark.”
You are accusing me of of telling you what you think or feel, AFTER YOU POSTED WHAT YOU THINK OR FEEL WHEN USING A WORD THAT YOU DON’T THINK SHOULD BE TAKEN LITERALLY!
You argued that you didn’t use the word “sure” as it is defined. You said you meant it like “I might know, but not definitely” (my paraphrase). I accepted that explanation, but now you say I’m making up the explanation too? What the actual fvck is wrong with you?
You don’t want your words taken literally, and you don’t want your explained meaning taken literally either. Wow.

As for never claiming there IS no list, I’ll help you with some simple and very commonly used things called QUOTATION MARKS. When you put quotes or “air quotes” in spoken language around a word (usually a noun), you are inferring that the noun is not real. As in “Show us your “deadly” karate skills, tough guy”. The quotes are your inference that there is nothing deadly at all. Or maybe this is easier: “Show me your “600 watt” EQ/booster from WalMart that costs thirty dollars”. The inference is that the 600 watts doesn’t exist.

You asked to see the “list”, which is inferring it does not exist.
No, this is not interpretation of your words. It is how the English language is used. If you really don’t understand this stuff, maybe take a night course. It’s 5th grade level material.

 

[Slo_Ride 5,000+ posts]

How do you not have any self awareness at all? Damn bro you seriously need to get right

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

So you agree that all those people from random walks of life just spontaneously decided to attack the Capitol on January 6th?
No common thread, just amazing coincidence?

Im agreeing that Trump literally and specifically used the word "peacefully" and that you are dodging that point.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

So... Not allowed to talk about Trump but you fucktard losers are talking about Hilary Clinton. Actually makes perfect sense. God lord. Toodles

Oh thank god you and I are on differing sides here. You agreeing with me could singlehandedly make me re-evaluate my entire stance on politics.