brutal sounds bs2.1 dyno WTF over 90% efficient???????????????

[bigblank69 10+ year member]

I should say I think the Uncertified 1 ohm test seemed pretty right on... I see 74.57% efficiency at clipping

 

[ciaonzo 5,000+ posts]

Any chance it has a second or third set of rails that switch on when needed, resulting in the somewhat better efficiency? I like the cap idea, too. Any of these monster amps using ultracaps inside yet? Just throwing out ideas.

 

[8 Inch Vince]

Brutal Sounds posted Dyno pics on their Facebook page. Their 5.1 clamped in at 4890 @ 1 ohm @ 13.89 volts. 240 amps drawn.

Doesn't seem possible but maybe these are just stupid efficient. 

 

[kcr357 10+ year member]

Brutal Sounds posted Dyno pics on their Facebook page. Their 5.1 clamped in at 4890 @ 1 ohm @ 13.89 volts. 240 amps drawn.

Doesn't seem possible but maybe these are just stupid efficient. 

Thats like 150% efficiency, kinda violates the laws of physics

 

[bigblank69 10+ year member]

Thats like 150% efficiency, kinda violates the laws of physics

I am willing to be the clamp was only on one input..... real number would be double that

 

[bigblank69 10+ year member]

On ‎6‎/‎17‎/‎2018 at 4:10 PM, TheFiverMan said:

Their explanation is actually not very good. If the amp makes it before clipping... it makes it before clipping. Honestly in my opinion the only way to "Trick" the dyno is to use a shorter duration sine wave.... you could do a build track that would be a shorter amount of time and I theorize it would produce more power than the 10 second standard track.