BOOMINGRANDPA 5,000+ posts
WOLFRAM FTW
91% at 1 ohm 2300rms wtf? i never seen anything like that.. also it almost does twice rated power at 4 ohm and 50% more at 2 ohm.. these things will sell like hotdogs at a ballgame..
but how they make it so efficient? every company should charge $50 more and use whatever part does that lol.. if u could run a 1500rms amp on stock electrical with no problems it'd be worth the $50.. i also don't think i've seen a amp do double rated before and diff not at 4ohmBrutal doesnt care much about profit margin.
When their 5k came out, they were selling it so cheap that Zenon emailed them that other customers of that board were complaining about Brutal undercutting their prices. (B2 and AL both have a 5k with that board)
Ratings don't mean anything. The manufacturer knows what it puts out and underrates it for a wow factor.but how they make it so efficient? every company should charge $50 more and use whatever part does that lol.. if u could run a 1500rms amp on stock electrical with no problems it'd be worth the $50.. i also don't think i've seen a amp do double rated before and diff not at 4ohm
That's what I thought.... I retested a ton and changed the batteries, was working fine.... I may try a couple more amps and see what happens... It was accurate on the Orion test.Something was wrong with the clamp.
The buildhouse rated the amp... Joey at Brutal Sounds had no idea the amp would outperform the ratings by that much...Ratings don't mean anything. The manufacturer knows what it puts out and underrates it for a wow factor.
Who knows. It may be some crazy good board.Doing this test made me wish I still had my old clamp... I got the same results time after timeàm
Clamps just fine, it's really a matter of resolution in time and the tool not being "right" for the job, although it is a great ballpark. If you had hundredth of a second resolution and data logs it would give you a much better idea of actual efficiencySomething was wrong with the clamp.