Zx200.4

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

I'm thinking about buying a Kicker ZX200.4 amp to power my Polk MOMO 6.5" Components. They are rated at 125watts rms, 250peak, and 4 ohms. Currently I'm running them with a MTX 342 amp which is only giving them 60watts and my 4x6s and 6x9s are louder than the components. Should the ZX200.4 wake them up a bit? (Plus I understand that amp is underrated and puts out between 240-250watts)

Click to read more...

 

[Polecat 5,000+ posts]

I would think so.... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

I also found the ZX250.2 but its only 85x2 at 4ohms but its underrated as well. Is the ZX200.4 still the better choice?

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

We you going to run them active or stay passive and use the cross over that came with them?

 

 

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

Active? Passive? Sorry, I'm still learning things. As of right now I'm using the cross overs that came with my components with the MTX 342.

 

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

Active? Passive? Sorry, I'm still learning things. As of right now I'm using the cross overs that came with my components with the MTX 342.

Sorry, Internet messed up and it posted multiple times.

 

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

Active? Passive? Sorry, I'm still learning things. As of right now I'm using the cross overs that came with my components with the MTX 342.

Sorry, internet messed up and it posted this multiple times.

 

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

bump

 

[denim 5,000+ posts]

Passive is when you use the crossovers that come with the components, active is when you use the crossovers on the head unit or the amplifier.

 

[Bruizer 10+ year member]

In that case passive. I'm using the crossovers that came with my components.