Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="XTRProBoy" data-source="post: 2449288" data-attributes="member: 571009">The funny thing is if you go back to when they first started making amps, they started out making good amps.&nbsp; Most of them were Fosgate rebadge/reshelled, and all the Strike and Storm (originally the amps were all Strike or Storm I believe) were all making more than rated power.&nbsp; The early amps never looked that nice (well a matter of opinion) but they were fine amps.&nbsp; The split power ones were an interesting idea too, but never really caught on and they stopped doing that--ashame.It&#039;s the whole Bolt (yellow) and F&amp;amp;F (multi-coloured) series crap they started making later on that gives them the bad name.&nbsp; Those amps are fairly poor but look at where they are sold (Wal-Mart, etc.) and look at the prices on them.&nbsp; They aren&#039;t meant to be anything more than low-end, crappy amps, LOL.I&#039;ve never really found anything wrong with anything in the Strike and Storm lines...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="XTRProBoy, post: 2449288, member: 571009"] The funny thing is if you go back to when they first started making amps, they started out making good amps. Most of them were Fosgate rebadge/reshelled, and all the Strike and Storm (originally the amps were all Strike or Storm I believe) were all making more than rated power. The early amps never looked that nice (well a matter of opinion) but they were fine amps. The split power ones were an interesting idea too, but never really caught on and they stopped doing that--ashame. It's the whole Bolt (yellow) and F&F (multi-coloured) series crap they started making later on that gives them the bad name. Those amps are fairly poor but look at where they are sold (Wal-Mart, etc.) and look at the prices on them. They aren't meant to be anything more than low-end, crappy amps, LOL. I've never really found anything wrong with anything in the Strike and Storm lines... [/QUOTE]

Verification