Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AlterEgo99" data-source="post: 6281540" data-attributes="member: 610253"><p>First off &#039;ol Faulky, you readily admit you don&#039;t work, so what the fvck do you care...you don&#039;t pay into the Ponzi scheme...the rest of us who actually contribute something to society do...and we ain&#039;t gonna see one fvckin&#039; dime of SS because it has been going bankrupt for fvcking years.&nbsp; It will be completely insolvent by the time my generation hits retirement age.&nbsp; And it seems like this all started in 1935 with FDR...not sure how this then becomes a &quot;Republican&quot; or &quot;Bush&quot; issue but then again, for as long as the Dems are in control of Congress (since 2006) and it is THEY who control the spending, and Barry is in the White House, it will always be Bush&#039;s fault...no matter that the &quot;stimulus&quot; package had nothing to do with it according to your logic, right?...yeah, that was much cheaper than TARP...just print more money...and that Barry and his congressional moonbat buddies were sitting right next to Bush and da boyz when they passed the TARP crap last Fall...I don&#039;t seem to recall a majority of folks on YOUR side of the aisle saying no to TARP...both sides went for it, but of course, it&#039;s all Bush&#039;s fault.&nbsp; More brilliant logic from the dimwit lefty troll &#039;ol Faulky.&nbsp; Over and out.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="AlterEgo99, post: 6281540, member: 610253"] First off 'ol Faulky, you readily admit you don't work, so what the fvck do you care...you don't pay into the Ponzi scheme...the rest of us who actually contribute something to society do...and we ain't gonna see one fvckin' dime of SS because it has been going bankrupt for fvcking years. It will be completely insolvent by the time my generation hits retirement age. And it seems like this all started in 1935 with FDR...not sure how this then becomes a "Republican" or "Bush" issue but then again, for as long as the Dems are in control of Congress (since 2006) and it is THEY who control the spending, and Barry is in the White House, it will always be Bush's fault...no matter that the "stimulus" package had nothing to do with it according to your logic, right?...yeah, that was much cheaper than TARP...just print more money...and that Barry and his congressional moonbat buddies were sitting right next to Bush and da boyz when they passed the TARP crap last Fall...I don't seem to recall a majority of folks on YOUR side of the aisle saying no to TARP...both sides went for it, but of course, it's all Bush's fault. More brilliant logic from the dimwit lefty troll 'ol Faulky. Over and out. [/QUOTE]

Verification