Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6247768" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Animated reply? Now you are just changing the subject. You cited statistics as some sort of proof, and when presented with the notion that those stats could mean almost anything, your reply was that it was 'data'. Again we appear to have hit the ceiling of your understanding of this discussion. That's okay, not flaming you, just saying you dont have to turn this into an argument of symantics just to avoid admittance of a lack of understanding.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6247768, member: 549629"] Animated reply? Now you are just changing the subject. You cited statistics as some sort of proof, and when presented with the notion that those stats could mean almost anything, your reply was that it was 'data'. Again we appear to have hit the ceiling of your understanding of this discussion. That's okay, not flaming you, just saying you dont have to turn this into an argument of symantics just to avoid admittance of a lack of understanding. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list