Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6247507" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>And I find it impossible to believe you have much statistical analysis experience if, when presented with the idea that statistics can be manipulated to suit an agenda, your reply is that statistics are 'data', implying they are raw facts, which they most certainly are not. Or, were you just stating they are 'data' in a benign reply that didn't address my point at all? Come on man, as someone said earlier, I feel more and more intellectual dishonesty creeping into your replies each time I read one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6247507, member: 549629"] And I find it impossible to believe you have much statistical analysis experience if, when presented with the idea that statistics can be manipulated to suit an agenda, your reply is that statistics are 'data', implying they are raw facts, which they most certainly are not. Or, were you just stating they are 'data' in a benign reply that didn't address my point at all? Come on man, as someone said earlier, I feel more and more intellectual dishonesty creeping into your replies each time I read one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list