Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6247053" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>The competitive market system would pretty much force the savings, at least somewhat, on to the consumer. If landlord A doesn't pass along any savings, landlord B would realize he can pass along say half the savings, advertise the property for less money, and therefore have better chances of selling his property. A very basic principal of supply and demand. Unless an illegal monopoly network was set in place by all the landlords getting together. But we have laws to combat this aternative.</p><p></p><p>My point was, even with cheaper housing and products, if jobs become harder to find due to higher competition for these jobs from people accepting lower wages, the inevitable of less income and/or lost jobs will result. Its a catch-22 cycle that our economy has not solved yet, and there are no easy answers to.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6247053, member: 549629"] The competitive market system would pretty much force the savings, at least somewhat, on to the consumer. If landlord A doesn't pass along any savings, landlord B would realize he can pass along say half the savings, advertise the property for less money, and therefore have better chances of selling his property. A very basic principal of supply and demand. Unless an illegal monopoly network was set in place by all the landlords getting together. But we have laws to combat this aternative. My point was, even with cheaper housing and products, if jobs become harder to find due to higher competition for these jobs from people accepting lower wages, the inevitable of less income and/or lost jobs will result. Its a catch-22 cycle that our economy has not solved yet, and there are no easy answers to. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list