Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 6246982" data-attributes="member: 549629">And you are entitled to your opinion. Especially because Im too lazy to research a counter. If you want to believe Fox is the worst, and the liberal organizations who were manipulating us through the &#039;news&#039; long before Fox news was even around are innocent in comparison, that&#039;s your choice. but dont expect to change too many minds here, or anywhere else, when you continue to show such a biased view of the situation.If &quot;all&quot; channels sensationalized it, I take it that includes Fox news as well? And when CNN did it, they of course only did it for the pure news aspect of it, right? And once it was found out the story revolved around a personal relationship that doesn&#039;t affect Sanford&#039;s ability to govern, CNN and the NY Times dropped the story.... right? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif Again your bias is reallt starting to show in your comments. Its too bad you cant see them too. One example is how you talk out of both sides of your mouth about the Sanford story. On the one hand you claim he could still run for pres and see how the votes pan out (even after taking a pounding from the press about how he&#039;s no longer a &#039;viable candidate&#039;), and on the other hand you claim he has &#039;lost support from his base&#039; when no vote has be taken on the matter. You want to believe he&#039;s lost support without really knowing either way, or you chose to believe the mostly liberal press who tells us to think this way.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 6246982, member: 549629"] And you are entitled to your opinion. Especially because Im too lazy to research a counter. If you want to believe Fox is the worst, and the liberal organizations who were manipulating us through the 'news' long before Fox news was even around are innocent in comparison, that's your choice. but dont expect to change too many minds here, or anywhere else, when you continue to show such a biased view of the situation. If "all" channels sensationalized it, I take it that includes Fox news as well? And when CNN did it, they of course only did it for the pure news aspect of it, right? And once it was found out the story revolved around a personal relationship that doesn't affect Sanford's ability to govern, CNN and the NY Times dropped the story.... right? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] Again your bias is reallt starting to show in your comments. Its too bad you cant see them too. One example is how you talk out of both sides of your mouth about the Sanford story. On the one hand you claim he could still run for pres and see how the votes pan out (even after taking a pounding from the press about how he's no longer a 'viable candidate'), and on the other hand you claim he has 'lost support from his base' when no vote has be taken on the matter. You want to believe he's lost support without really knowing either way, or you chose to believe the mostly liberal press who tells us to think this way. [/QUOTE]

Verification