Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Enellz" data-source="post: 6246746" data-attributes="member: 586963">Medicare was thought out anyway when made into law. It was just a quick fix, to help seniors live their &#039;golden&#039; years. It should be rid of entirely IMO. I don&#039;t think thier should be &#039;free&#039; government healthcare, but I do agree the government should throw in a option that will help them lower thier price. I pay about 140 every two weeks for heatlhcare for me and my son which is about 280 a month. Which is crazy high when we only go to the doctor for check ups.Here would be my plan, input a government option, at a resonable price to help promote competition among the blood suckers. Also with car, house, life, or what ever other kind of insurance, you should get 30% back if nothing comes up for that year or even two years. I mean if I put money in this pot to be insured, and nothing happens. Shouldn&#039;t my family get a portion of that money back?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Enellz, post: 6246746, member: 586963"] Medicare was thought out anyway when made into law. It was just a quick fix, to help seniors live their 'golden' years. It should be rid of entirely IMO. I don't think thier should be 'free' government healthcare, but I do agree the government should throw in a option that will help them lower thier price. I pay about 140 every two weeks for heatlhcare for me and my son which is about 280 a month. Which is crazy high when we only go to the doctor for check ups. Here would be my plan, input a government option, at a resonable price to help promote competition among the blood suckers. Also with car, house, life, or what ever other kind of insurance, you should get 30% back if nothing comes up for that year or even two years. I mean if I put money in this pot to be insured, and nothing happens. Shouldn't my family get a portion of that money back? [/QUOTE]

Verification