Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cotjones" data-source="post: 6243538" data-attributes="member: 573988"><p>This is what you call a PWN? </p><p>The only thing you successfully did is select the words you couldn't argue with and discarded them from the discussion.</p><p></p><p>Fact: You presented the originally posted study as evidence that we need health care reform. Implicating the theory that the current health care system is flawed to the point of instigating bankruptcy.</p><p></p><p>Fact: This Implication is not correctly supported by the data whatsoever.</p><p></p><p>Fact: The fact that said data may indeed be on topic does not necessitate relevance to the discussion.</p><p></p><p>Opinion: The only thing the data does, is attempt to use scare tactics and irrelevant conclusions falsely to encourage personal agendas of supporting health care reform. In short, it is propagandist jargon and as such is worthy to be discarded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cotjones, post: 6243538, member: 573988"] This is what you call a PWN? The only thing you successfully did is select the words you couldn't argue with and discarded them from the discussion. Fact: You presented the originally posted study as evidence that we need health care reform. Implicating the theory that the current health care system is flawed to the point of instigating bankruptcy. Fact: This Implication is not correctly supported by the data whatsoever. Fact: The fact that said data may indeed be on topic does not necessitate relevance to the discussion. Opinion: The only thing the data does, is attempt to use scare tactics and irrelevant conclusions falsely to encourage personal agendas of supporting health care reform. In short, it is propagandist jargon and as such is worthy to be discarded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
