Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flipx99" data-source="post: 6241451" data-attributes="member: 562352"><p>No, you didn't. Yes, I may have a master's degree in a field where there is a shortage. Yes, I may have ultra secure employment. However, I don't for a second take any of it for granted. I attempt to be prepared, at all times, to be willing to mop floors, pick cabbage, etc to maintain. I may have more options than most, but I have seen people in better situations than me working at Wendy's. And it had nothing to do with drugs.</p><p></p><p>Is this improvement in the circumstances of the lower ranks of the people to be regarded as an advantage or as an inconveniency to the society? The answer seems at first sight abundantly plain. Servants, labourers, and workmen of different kinds, make up the far greater part of every great political society. But what improves the circumstances of the greater part can never be regarded as an inconveniency to the whole.</p><p></p><p>No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, clothe, and lodge the whole body of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own labour as to be themselves tolerably well fed, clothed, and lodged.</p><p></p><p>I do not believe it is the responsibility of people to ensure the happiness of society. And **** man, you keep posting the same shit over and over. While it does have some relevancy to the subject matter, it requires you to believe certain ways about human nature. We obviously disagree with the constitution of human nature. Thus, quoting sources who posit a differing OPINION on the basis of human nature makes no sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sometimes animals are selfish and sometimes they are not...kind of like people. Why must we legislate what you feel is a moral obligation?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flipx99, post: 6241451, member: 562352"] No, you didn't. Yes, I may have a master's degree in a field where there is a shortage. Yes, I may have ultra secure employment. However, I don't for a second take any of it for granted. I attempt to be prepared, at all times, to be willing to mop floors, pick cabbage, etc to maintain. I may have more options than most, but I have seen people in better situations than me working at Wendy's. And it had nothing to do with drugs. Is this improvement in the circumstances of the lower ranks of the people to be regarded as an advantage or as an inconveniency to the society? The answer seems at first sight abundantly plain. Servants, labourers, and workmen of different kinds, make up the far greater part of every great political society. But what improves the circumstances of the greater part can never be regarded as an inconveniency to the whole. No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far greater part of the members are poor and miserable. It is but equity, besides, that they who feed, clothe, and lodge the whole body of the people, should have such a share of the produce of their own labour as to be themselves tolerably well fed, clothed, and lodged. I do not believe it is the responsibility of people to ensure the happiness of society. And **** man, you keep posting the same shit over and over. While it does have some relevancy to the subject matter, it requires you to believe certain ways about human nature. We obviously disagree with the constitution of human nature. Thus, quoting sources who posit a differing OPINION on the basis of human nature makes no sense. Sometimes animals are selfish and sometimes they are not...kind of like people. Why must we legislate what you feel is a moral obligation? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
