Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flipx99" data-source="post: 6241285" data-attributes="member: 562352"><p>I competed with the Juans of the world for that restroom cleaning job. I'd compete with him again if I needed funds.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree with adam smith. There is no logical reason why the rich should give to the poor. He is thinking we have an obligation to ensure people don't starve to death because it is of little inconvience. Animals will vomit and shit on food to keep other animals from eating it. Adam Smith is referring to a moral obligation, not something based on logic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flipx99, post: 6241285, member: 562352"] I competed with the Juans of the world for that restroom cleaning job. I'd compete with him again if I needed funds. I disagree with adam smith. There is no logical reason why the rich should give to the poor. He is thinking we have an obligation to ensure people don't starve to death because it is of little inconvience. Animals will vomit and shit on food to keep other animals from eating it. Adam Smith is referring to a moral obligation, not something based on logic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
