Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="faulkton" data-source="post: 6239577" data-attributes="member: 561910"><p>Nice backpedaling.</p><p></p><p>Obviously its relevant to the the discussion.</p><p></p><p>The likelihood that a single limited study, such as this, is going to demonstrate causality or alone will "clearly enough indicate that medical reform is favorable or needed" (whatever statistical standard that requires //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif) is extremely finite.</p><p></p><p>Dismissinging it altogether from the dialog is a confirmatory bias and a poor understanding of how social science research operates.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 36px"><span style="color: Blue">YOU = MAJOR FAIL</span></span></p><p></p><p>Dont worry though i bet only myself and flip were able to even see why you were so fukking wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="faulkton, post: 6239577, member: 561910"] Nice backpedaling. Obviously its relevant to the the discussion. The likelihood that a single limited study, such as this, is going to demonstrate causality or alone will "clearly enough indicate that medical reform is favorable or needed" (whatever statistical standard that requires [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG]) is extremely finite. Dismissinging it altogether from the dialog is a confirmatory bias and a poor understanding of how social science research operates. [SIZE=36px][COLOR=Blue]YOU = MAJOR FAIL[/COLOR][/SIZE] Dont worry though i bet only myself and flip were able to even see why you were so fukking wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
