Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flipx99" data-source="post: 6232610" data-attributes="member: 562352"><p>Polanyi seems to imply that this is wrong or against nature. It seems to me that this is the evolvement of mankind. We are evolving out of social contracts, and to an extent, society in general. I would argue that the mechansims of distributing "the hunt" are inefficient and as we found more efficient ways to distribute goods and services social contracts do indeed break down. Not because of a de-evolution of society, but upon the realization that it is not needed when the market is performing correctly. However, I contend the market is always performing correctly. What happens is fear (a very basic instinct) causes us to revert back to a more primitive state -- ie social networks and social contracts. If we were unafraid of the pitfalls of capitalism and willing to work through them with the FAITH that the end result would be greater, communal distribution of goods and services wouldn't be needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flipx99, post: 6232610, member: 562352"] Polanyi seems to imply that this is wrong or against nature. It seems to me that this is the evolvement of mankind. We are evolving out of social contracts, and to an extent, society in general. I would argue that the mechansims of distributing "the hunt" are inefficient and as we found more efficient ways to distribute goods and services social contracts do indeed break down. Not because of a de-evolution of society, but upon the realization that it is not needed when the market is performing correctly. However, I contend the market is always performing correctly. What happens is fear (a very basic instinct) causes us to revert back to a more primitive state -- ie social networks and social contracts. If we were unafraid of the pitfalls of capitalism and willing to work through them with the FAITH that the end result would be greater, communal distribution of goods and services wouldn't be needed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list