Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Flipx99" data-source="post: 6232380" data-attributes="member: 562352"><p>I read through it.</p><p></p><p>Here is where I am stuck.</p><p></p><p>What's good for society versus what's good for the individual (more specifically, myself). I feel I can protect myself and navigate any waters. I don't think much of society is concerned with 5 year plans (although Stalin killed 20M people, he was an excellent has creating/executing plans).</p><p></p><p>However, I am suspect of any inclination that the US has a free market. That was gone a long time ago.</p><p></p><p>The only point of contention I have with the author is that he seems to imply that "pushing the limits of nature and turning humans into commodities" is a bad thing. I think it is not. Therefore, I don't, on first reading (to give an honest effort, I'd have to read it atleast twice. Some may call me 'stupid' for this but whatever) have many objections to the article based on the facts presented. Because I align myself with a corporatist perspective (which again, has issues...mainly my inability to show empathy), I don't believe many of the things he claims as bad, are indeed bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Flipx99, post: 6232380, member: 562352"] I read through it. Here is where I am stuck. What's good for society versus what's good for the individual (more specifically, myself). I feel I can protect myself and navigate any waters. I don't think much of society is concerned with 5 year plans (although Stalin killed 20M people, he was an excellent has creating/executing plans). However, I am suspect of any inclination that the US has a free market. That was gone a long time ago. The only point of contention I have with the author is that he seems to imply that "pushing the limits of nature and turning humans into commodities" is a bad thing. I think it is not. Therefore, I don't, on first reading (to give an honest effort, I'd have to read it atleast twice. Some may call me 'stupid' for this but whatever) have many objections to the article based on the facts presented. Because I align myself with a corporatist perspective (which again, has issues...mainly my inability to show empathy), I don't believe many of the things he claims as bad, are indeed bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list