Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zealous" data-source="post: 6148197" data-attributes="member: 606116">And a popular example of how information is lost is through the breeding of dogs: a dog that has been bred to lose the genetic traits of it&#039;s predecessors is not going to regain that lost information through random mutation.&nbsp;There are two &quot;types&quot; of evolution: micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Micro-evolution is what has been observed by scientists as changes within a species, but not the changing of one species into another. This is also known as &quot;adaptation&quot;, and is proven scientific fact.&nbsp; This is not to be confused with macro-evolution, which is large scale change (from goo to you style), and has not been observed by any scientist, at least, to my knowledge, thus making it conjecture. Darwinists are macro-evolutionists who put their faith (yes, macro-evolution requires faith) in a theory (the theory of macro-evolution) that has yet to be &quot;demonstrated&quot; or &quot;observed&quot;. So, yes, I am using the word in a colloquial sense in describing Darwinist Evolutionary Theory, and feel quite comfortable (and correct) in doing so. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zealous, post: 6148197, member: 606116"] And a popular example of how information is lost is through the breeding of dogs: a dog that has been bred to lose the genetic traits of it's predecessors is not going to regain that lost information through random mutation. There are two "types" of evolution: micro-evolution and macro-evolution. Micro-evolution is what has been observed by scientists as changes within a species, but not the changing of one species into another. This is also known as "adaptation", and is proven scientific fact. This is not to be confused with macro-evolution, which is large scale change (from goo to you style), and has not been observed by any scientist, at least, to my knowledge, thus making it conjecture. Darwinists are macro-evolutionists who put their faith (yes, macro-evolution requires faith) in a theory (the theory of macro-evolution) that has yet to be "demonstrated" or "observed". So, yes, I am using the word in a colloquial sense in describing Darwinist Evolutionary Theory, and feel quite comfortable (and correct) in doing so. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification