Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="konechiwa" data-source="post: 3639294" data-attributes="member: 568044"><p>you make fun of people for not critically analyzing every word of the constitution, yet you don't even use accurate dates? You even made numerous typos. I would expect someone like yourself would at least put the right date down</p><p></p><p>I'm not dodging the subject.</p><p></p><p>A cannonball would not destroy the white house. A fire would burn it down, maybe, but it would be rebuilt in the same place in no time.</p><p></p><p>A nuclear weapon, after the fallout, would destroy it, and keep it destroyed. That is why you can't get them.</p><p></p><p>And, if you think that we should be able to get them, because a 200+ year old document says we can have the right "to bear arms" then you are a fool. This shouldn't even be a matter of debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="konechiwa, post: 3639294, member: 568044"] you make fun of people for not critically analyzing every word of the constitution, yet you don't even use accurate dates? You even made numerous typos. I would expect someone like yourself would at least put the right date down I'm not dodging the subject. A cannonball would not destroy the white house. A fire would burn it down, maybe, but it would be rebuilt in the same place in no time. A nuclear weapon, after the fallout, would destroy it, and keep it destroyed. That is why you can't get them. And, if you think that we should be able to get them, because a 200+ year old document says we can have the right "to bear arms" then you are a fool. This shouldn't even be a matter of debate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
