Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jrerun21" data-source="post: 3610985" data-attributes="member: 570954"><p>A lot of science is based on assumption and "fact" that can be proven only through implication when compared with other data. The problem is that scientist have beliefs before the experimentation phase. Due to their prejudice, they gear experimentation for certain outcome. When an experiment fails their believed outcome, they mold the experiment to have that outcome. Its not to say that there are theories that have been discovered that are true. But the ideas that paleontologist and other scientist fabricate from fossil remains is sometimes ridiculous. Looking at the CGI documentaries they come up with and cavemen stories are all guesstimations. So scientifically proven has little weight on some things and higher weight on others. There are scientific models, and laws that don't agree with each other... Why? Because it's our feeble attempt to understand the complex nature of the world around us.</p><p></p><p>Don't shoot the messenger though... I majored in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology... but taking a Philosophy of Science course really exposed the flaws for me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jrerun21, post: 3610985, member: 570954"] A lot of science is based on assumption and "fact" that can be proven only through implication when compared with other data. The problem is that scientist have beliefs before the experimentation phase. Due to their prejudice, they gear experimentation for certain outcome. When an experiment fails their believed outcome, they mold the experiment to have that outcome. Its not to say that there are theories that have been discovered that are true. But the ideas that paleontologist and other scientist fabricate from fossil remains is sometimes ridiculous. Looking at the CGI documentaries they come up with and cavemen stories are all guesstimations. So scientifically proven has little weight on some things and higher weight on others. There are scientific models, and laws that don't agree with each other... Why? Because it's our feeble attempt to understand the complex nature of the world around us. Don't shoot the messenger though... I majored in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology... but taking a Philosophy of Science course really exposed the flaws for me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list