Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 3547178" data-attributes="member: 540942">he did jeopardize his safety, i agree. he jeopardized his safety for the greater good. that being stopping two thieves who he jsut witnessed breaking into his neighbor&#039;s house. he took a step most would not take, he put his own safety to the side to defend the rights and property of his neighbor.and it&#039;s not the jsut the goods, it&#039;s the principle. it&#039;s the sheer foundation of what we hold to be the truth. those thieves were violating another man&#039;s home and safety. they didn&#039;t hold their fellow man&#039;s rights above their own, rather, they tramped them straight into teh ground by breaking into that person&#039;s home. for their own personal gain and they cared less to whom they did it to or of what consquenses to caused that person. why treat them any better then they were treating the victim?and this has nothing to do with slavery or color or anything of that nature. i would be backing joe if he was black and the thieves were white. it doesn&#039;t equate to that at all. if you are tryint to read that into it, you need to rethink yourself. this is nothing more then one man finally standing up for himself and his neighbor&#039;s right to live a life without fear of being robbed.again, don&#039;t forget, this all started because two people broke the law by breaking into someone else&#039;s property. the fact they were killed by teh victims neighbor is their own fault. you want lay blame, then lay it where it deserves to be laid. at the feet of the two thieves. accountability. they were held accountable, period.wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 3547178, member: 540942"] he did jeopardize his safety, i agree. he jeopardized his safety for the greater good. that being stopping two thieves who he jsut witnessed breaking into his neighbor's house. he took a step most would not take, he put his own safety to the side to defend the rights and property of his neighbor. and it's not the jsut the goods, it's the principle. it's the sheer foundation of what we hold to be the truth. those thieves were violating another man's home and safety. they didn't hold their fellow man's rights above their own, rather, they tramped them straight into teh ground by breaking into that person's home. for their own personal gain and they cared less to whom they did it to or of what consquenses to caused that person. why treat them any better then they were treating the victim? and this has nothing to do with slavery or color or anything of that nature. i would be backing joe if he was black and the thieves were white. it doesn't equate to that at all. if you are tryint to read that into it, you need to rethink yourself. this is nothing more then one man finally standing up for himself and his neighbor's right to live a life without fear of being robbed. again, don't forget, this all started because two people broke the law by breaking into someone else's property. the fact they were killed by teh victims neighbor is their own fault. you want lay blame, then lay it where it deserves to be laid. at the feet of the two thieves. accountability. they were held accountable, period. wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification