Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="faulkton" data-source="post: 3507700" data-attributes="member: 561910">If you had any reading comprehension skills you might have noticed that i didn&#039;t place myself on any high horse and in fact went to great length to ensure that this was clear. Nonetheless, you still missed the obvious and mistook my post for a pompous insult.So, since you are obviously having difficulty, lets look again at what i said.Who am i being derogatory toward?Why it&#039;s me!Oh lord!How ironic!!What a high horse I am on!!2!Whats next?!Could it be that i would emphasize the fact that i am taking a jab at myself?!No it couldn&#039;t possibly be that!Gasp!Why i couldn&#039;t have been more wrong!!In fact that is exactly what i did!I drove home the fact that we are both doing exactly the same thing and this was my intent!Oh noes!!I would also like to mention the fact that your argument has shifted. The conversation you started involved the disincentive welfare provides for people to work. It was in no way encompassing of the incentive welfare provides for people seek employment outside of the legal system.If that had been your argument, i would have demanded to know what your proposed solution to such a problem would be because it would appear that the only way to curb such a problem would be greater regulation and policing of industry, something that sounds pretty fukkin liberal to me.I&#039;m a little disappointed in how easily you are manipulated. I thought you would have known better by now.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="faulkton, post: 3507700, member: 561910"] If you had any reading comprehension skills you might have noticed that i didn't place myself on any high horse and in fact went to great length to ensure that this was clear. Nonetheless, you still missed the obvious and mistook my post for a pompous insult. So, since you are obviously having difficulty, lets look again at what i said. Who am i being derogatory toward? Why it's me! Oh lord! How ironic!! What a high horse I am on!!2! Whats next?! Could it be that i would emphasize the fact that i am taking a jab at myself?! No it couldn't possibly be that! Gasp! Why i couldn't have been more wrong!! [I]In fact that is exactly what i did![/I] I drove home the fact that we are both doing exactly the same thing and this was my intent! Oh noes!! I would also like to mention the fact that your argument has shifted. The conversation you started involved the disincentive welfare provides for people to work. It was in no way encompassing of the incentive welfare provides for people seek employment outside of the legal system. If that had been your argument, i would have demanded to know what your proposed solution to such a problem would be because it would appear that the only way to curb such a problem would be greater regulation and policing of industry, something that sounds pretty fukkin liberal to me. I'm a little disappointed in how easily you are manipulated. I thought you would have known better by now. [/QUOTE]

Verification