Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="faulkton" data-source="post: 3502743" data-attributes="member: 561910"><p>stop getting all your news from talk radio.</p><p></p><p></p><p>stop getting all your news from talk radio.</p><p></p><p></p><p>uh no. Maybe that is what pat robinsons endorsement will mean, but you cant say that with any certainty yet. Dobson (focus on the family) has already said he would run a third party if Rudy gets the nomination. That cannot be discounted.</p><p></p><p>Try reading this, it emphasizes they current splits within the evangelical movement.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/magazine/28Evangelicals-t.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/magazine/28Evangelicals-t.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;oref=slogin</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>What exactly are you saying?</p><p></p><p>The government should exercise more control over the medical industry?</p><p></p><p>Advocating more regulation of the medical industry sure sounds like a pretty liberal policy to me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You most certainly can blame the republican majority for the liberal bush spending. They did control federal spending from 1994 until 2006.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="faulkton, post: 3502743, member: 561910"] stop getting all your news from talk radio. stop getting all your news from talk radio. uh no. Maybe that is what pat robinsons endorsement will mean, but you cant say that with any certainty yet. Dobson (focus on the family) has already said he would run a third party if Rudy gets the nomination. That cannot be discounted. Try reading this, it emphasizes they current splits within the evangelical movement. [URL="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/magazine/28Evangelicals-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&oref=slogin"]http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/magazine/28Evangelicals-t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&oref=slogin[/URL] What exactly are you saying? The government should exercise more control over the medical industry? Advocating more regulation of the medical industry sure sounds like a pretty liberal policy to me. You most certainly can blame the republican majority for the liberal bush spending. They did control federal spending from 1994 until 2006. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list