Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HCCA" data-source="post: 3086016" data-attributes="member: 571196">That&#039;s the point, Rich B., he didn&#039;t lie! That&#039;s what you people don&#039;t seem to get! They simply took the testimony of reporters like Chris Mathews as fact, without question, and cross examined Libbey for 8 solid hours...trying to get him to make a mistake in his recollection of the timeline events....about a crime that never exhisted in the first place!! It would be like trying to cross examine you for 8 hours about how you slapped me....and you have no arms! Everyone would know you could not have done it, but when you give your testimony 16 times, and change your statement just one time......YOU LIED!!! That&#039;s just what happened here. That is exactly what happened in this case. So, please explain to me HOW he could lie about outing Valerie Plame, when it was known that it was Richard Armitage who leaked her name to Bob Novak?Faulkton, so you know what the underlying crime was. Do tell...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HCCA, post: 3086016, member: 571196"] That's the point, Rich B., he didn't lie! That's what you people don't seem to get! They simply took the testimony of reporters like Chris Mathews as fact, without question, and cross examined Libbey for 8 solid hours...trying to get him to make a mistake in his recollection of the timeline events....about a crime that never exhisted in the first place!! It would be like trying to cross examine you for 8 hours about how you slapped me....and you have no arms! Everyone would know you could not have done it, but when you give your testimony 16 times, and change your statement just one time......YOU LIED!!! That's just what happened here. That is exactly what happened in this case. So, please explain to me HOW he could lie about outing Valerie Plame, when it was known that it was Richard Armitage who leaked her name to Bob Novak? Faulkton, so you know what the underlying crime was. Do tell... [/QUOTE]

Verification