Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HCCA" data-source="post: 3085685" data-attributes="member: 571196"><p>C'mon faulkton...let's be real. Re-read my previous post. Libby could not lie if there was nothing to lie about!!! We KNOW that the guy they were after was Richard Armitage. YET...they continued to pursue Libby! They hounded him until they could make him slip up, and get him to mix up his statements. They succeded. WHY?? Why pursue him whan they already knew what it was that they SAID they were after! They already had the info that they wanted. THEY ALREADY KNEW THE LEAKER, AND IT WASN"T LIBBY!! Yet they pursued this course, and we now know why. They were looking to....as you are....smear the Bush administration any way you possibly can! Faulkton, I call a spade a spade when I see one. If he was guilty, I would have been right there with you saying "Put him away!" But, this investigation was a crock. If you had any integrity at all you would agree, after know ALL the facts....Bush hater, or not.</p><p></p><p>Clinton was another issue. For you to draw that comparison, Clinton would have to have been pursued for prosecution about something that NEVER happened. Then, get convicted about lying about that something that never happed!!! We know in fact, with Clinton, that it did. So, the comparison is invalid.</p><p></p><p>Adam71, your outright hatred of Bush was apparent. And, like those behind this travesty of an investigation, your blind hatred of Bush is your sole motivation. I'll say it again, if the guy was truely guilty, I would be right there with you saying, "Nail him to the wall." ...and, BTW, Bush won both elections, outright. The national news media went to Florida to recount the votes....hoping to find that he did not win. They would have the news media story of the century if they did, so you know they wanted to find for Gore. They wanted it as bad as you. They quietly, bitterly, and resentfully concluded that he did, in fact, win. So, your own buddies in the national news media couldn't find a way to count the ballots in such a way as to make Gore the winner. Get over it! Jeeez...some time in your bitter, hate filled life, get over it!!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HCCA, post: 3085685, member: 571196"] C'mon faulkton...let's be real. Re-read my previous post. Libby could not lie if there was nothing to lie about!!! We KNOW that the guy they were after was Richard Armitage. YET...they continued to pursue Libby! They hounded him until they could make him slip up, and get him to mix up his statements. They succeded. WHY?? Why pursue him whan they already knew what it was that they SAID they were after! They already had the info that they wanted. THEY ALREADY KNEW THE LEAKER, AND IT WASN"T LIBBY!! Yet they pursued this course, and we now know why. They were looking to....as you are....smear the Bush administration any way you possibly can! Faulkton, I call a spade a spade when I see one. If he was guilty, I would have been right there with you saying "Put him away!" But, this investigation was a crock. If you had any integrity at all you would agree, after know ALL the facts....Bush hater, or not. Clinton was another issue. For you to draw that comparison, Clinton would have to have been pursued for prosecution about something that NEVER happened. Then, get convicted about lying about that something that never happed!!! We know in fact, with Clinton, that it did. So, the comparison is invalid. Adam71, your outright hatred of Bush was apparent. And, like those behind this travesty of an investigation, your blind hatred of Bush is your sole motivation. I'll say it again, if the guy was truely guilty, I would be right there with you saying, "Nail him to the wall." ...and, BTW, Bush won both elections, outright. The national news media went to Florida to recount the votes....hoping to find that he did not win. They would have the news media story of the century if they did, so you know they wanted to find for Gore. They wanted it as bad as you. They quietly, bitterly, and resentfully concluded that he did, in fact, win. So, your own buddies in the national news media couldn't find a way to count the ballots in such a way as to make Gore the winner. Get over it! Jeeez...some time in your bitter, hate filled life, get over it!!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
