Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HCCA" data-source="post: 3083899" data-attributes="member: 571196"><p>Ummm... are you on crack?!?! Her status had nothing to do with this? Are you for real?!? Her status has everything to do with this! If she was not covert, then there was no case to investigate!!! If John Armitage was discovered to be the "leaker", (Like it would even matter... if Plame was not covert to begin with...and she wasn't.) the case should have been dropped. And, if Libby was not the leaker, then what did he have to lie about?? That IS what this case was supposed to be all about. That's what Chuck Schuemer was after when he pressed the JD for this case to go forward! So what is it that Libby was supposed to be lying about? What did he stand to gain? We know who the leaker was, and it was not Libby. So....whay did the case continue to go forward? It was attempt to smear the Bush administration. That's it, that's all. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/*******.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HCCA, post: 3083899, member: 571196"] Ummm... are you on crack?!?! Her status had nothing to do with this? Are you for real?!? Her status has everything to do with this! If she was not covert, then there was no case to investigate!!! If John Armitage was discovered to be the "leaker", (Like it would even matter... if Plame was not covert to begin with...and she wasn't.) the case should have been dropped. And, if Libby was not the leaker, then what did he have to lie about?? That IS what this case was supposed to be all about. That's what Chuck Schuemer was after when he pressed the JD for this case to go forward! So what is it that Libby was supposed to be lying about? What did he stand to gain? We know who the leaker was, and it was not Libby. So....whay did the case continue to go forward? It was attempt to smear the Bush administration. That's it, that's all. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/*******.gif.a649d21efc0d1fd4890a6428166586c1.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
why that was nice
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list