Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="faulkton" data-source="post: 2188028" data-attributes="member: 561910">uh, i would say clinton, simply by not invading, didnt do a bad job;&nbsp; he did a good job in that respect.&nbsp; Also it&#039;s the occupation of their land and death ofhundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians that is breeding new &#039;terrorist&#039;.. if you want to call them that. I have a hard time calling people defending their country from invading forces who are trying to force foreign political systems upon them terrorist.Didnt you hear, the majority of violence in iraq is sectarian violence? do you know what civil war is? We are trying to get rid of iraqis who are killing iraqis?yeah //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif mission accomplished right?That is the exact is the exact kind of paranoid over reactionary rhetoric that is costing us any sort of international respect we might have had.A strong argument can also be made that we are less safe having a strong Shiite coalition comprised of iran, iraq and syria. At least saddam was a break in that block, keeping both countries in check.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="faulkton, post: 2188028, member: 561910"] uh, i would say clinton, simply by [I]not[/I] invading, didnt do a bad job; he did a [I]good[/I] job in that respect. Also it's the occupation of their land and death of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians that is breeding new 'terrorist'.. if you want to call them that. I have a hard time calling people defending their country from invading forces who are trying to force foreign political systems upon them terrorist. Didnt you hear, the majority of violence in iraq is sectarian violence? do you know what civil war is? We are trying to get rid of iraqis who are killing iraqis? yeah [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] mission accomplished right? That is the exact is the exact kind of paranoid over reactionary rhetoric that is costing us any sort of international respect we might have had. A strong argument can also be made that we are less safe having a strong Shiite coalition comprised of iran, iraq and syria. At least saddam was a break in that block, keeping both countries in check. [/QUOTE]

Verification