Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark_ab" data-source="post: 26720" data-attributes="member: 541433">Why? Often times brands (as Jlman stated) make certain products better, through experience or other. Why settle for aesthetics when you can get performance? A true audiophile would not question such a thing.A lot of the top competitors have &#039;all the same stuff&#039; because of sponsorship. It would be difficult for the average 9-5 worker to be a top contender in a DB drag competition without having at least some sponsorship.You are incorrect, it can save you a LOT of money. If you have all Phoenex Gold equipment and opt for JBL amplifiers instead of PG Ti amps you will save a bundle (although the PG amps are superior - nonetheless, it&#039;s an example of saving money for the average person). There are literally thousands of other examples. Most do not have money to throw around, and if it will save even $100 at the sacrifice of nothing but looks, I&#039;d wager the majority would do it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark_ab, post: 26720, member: 541433"] Why? Often times brands (as Jlman stated) make certain products better, through experience or other. Why settle for aesthetics when you can get performance? A true audiophile would not question such a thing. A lot of the top competitors have 'all the same stuff' because of sponsorship. It would be difficult for the average 9-5 worker to be a top contender in a DB drag competition without having at least some sponsorship. You are incorrect, it can save you a LOT of money. If you have all Phoenex Gold equipment and opt for JBL amplifiers instead of PG Ti amps you will save a bundle (although the PG amps are superior - nonetheless, it's an example of saving money for the average person). There are literally thousands of other examples. Most do not have money to throw around, and if it will save even $100 at the sacrifice of nothing but looks, I'd wager the majority would do it. [/QUOTE]

Verification