Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Why Active is better than Passive..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeffdachef" data-source="post: 8279986" data-attributes="member: 650438"><p>you can actually generate a tone via audacity for 3500 hz, put it on a cd, usb, phone or w/e music source, you turn the knob until it starts cutting out then thats when you know your in the right ballpark. Its not going to be exact but should be within 50hz give or take depending on how good your ears are. There's always meade's CC-1 thing but thats still has at least a 20 hz margin of error. Many ways to get around not having an expensive sound processor. SQ with loads of money dumped all over it is fine, but I really like it when you can achieve SQ on a small but healthy budget.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeffdachef, post: 8279986, member: 650438"] you can actually generate a tone via audacity for 3500 hz, put it on a cd, usb, phone or w/e music source, you turn the knob until it starts cutting out then thats when you know your in the right ballpark. Its not going to be exact but should be within 50hz give or take depending on how good your ears are. There's always meade's CC-1 thing but thats still has at least a 20 hz margin of error. Many ways to get around not having an expensive sound processor. SQ with loads of money dumped all over it is fine, but I really like it when you can achieve SQ on a small but healthy budget. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Why Active is better than Passive..
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list