Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Why Active is better than Passive..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jeffdachef" data-source="post: 8279986" data-attributes="member: 650438"><p>you can actually generate a tone via audacity for 3500 hz, put it on a cd, usb, phone or w/e music source, you turn the knob until it starts cutting out then thats when you know your in the right ballpark. Its not going to be exact but should be within 50hz give or take depending on how good your ears are. There's always meade's CC-1 thing but thats still has at least a 20 hz margin of error. Many ways to get around not having an expensive sound processor. SQ with loads of money dumped all over it is fine, but I really like it when you can achieve SQ on a small but healthy budget.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jeffdachef, post: 8279986, member: 650438"] you can actually generate a tone via audacity for 3500 hz, put it on a cd, usb, phone or w/e music source, you turn the knob until it starts cutting out then thats when you know your in the right ballpark. Its not going to be exact but should be within 50hz give or take depending on how good your ears are. There's always meade's CC-1 thing but thats still has at least a 20 hz margin of error. Many ways to get around not having an expensive sound processor. SQ with loads of money dumped all over it is fine, but I really like it when you can achieve SQ on a small but healthy budget. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Why Active is better than Passive..
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh