Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 7289656" data-attributes="member: 549629">This post highlights the fundamental flaw in your logic. Lets break it down. To reproduce a 40hz note, the cone moves back and forth 40 times in one second. You talk about larger subs and longer excursion 'slowing down' how long it takes to make one cycle. Both the longer excursion sub, and the shorter one, are oscillating 40 times per second. The longer excursion sub is actually having to move its cone faster to achieve that 40 cycles per second.If your theory was true and the longer excursion sub took more time to reproduce each cycle, it would no longer be moving 40 cycles per second, and thus would be playing a lower note, not getting 'muddy'. Since we know distortion is not a lowering of frequency, your idea that the long excursion sub being slower cant possibly be true.</blockquote>

Top