What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Go into an airport and tell them you are going to blow the place up.
Let us know how well your 1st Amendment defense works out for you.

Little different from spreading anti-vax propaganda.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

That spreading anti-vax information isn't acceptable.

No, why would you say that? Have I ever said anything that implies I would restrict people's freedom of speech?

Gee idk

Go into an airport and tell them you are going to blow the place up.
Let us know how well your 1st Amendment defense works out for you.

Little different from spreading anti-vax propaganda.

Rob, that’s a retarded comparison.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

No predictions backed by fact are not wishing thinking and hoping. The whole insurance industry is built on the ability to accurately forecast - again I give you actuary tables. On a more intrinsic level humans do this all time - for example we'll avoid certain roads/routes when driving because they're more likely to have traffic or accidents.

“Insurance companies may be filing lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers in the near future.

So says one of the country’s top epidemiologists, Harvey Risch of Yale University.”

“The first of these statements came from OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison.

Davison claimed that a “one-in-200-year catastrophe” had been caused by death rates rising to 40 percent, an “unheard of” level according to him, Just the News reported.

“In addition, Davison noted that “most claims aren’t filed as COVID-related deaths.””

“In order to make up for this cost, insurers, rightly or wrongly, may be looking at the impact of COVID vaccines may or may not have had on the general public.”

Top Epidemiologist Expects Insurance Companies to Sue Vaccine Makers Over 'Early' and 'Unexpected' Deaths

A top epidemiologist from Yale University claims that insurers will soon seek to sue various COVID vaccine manufacturers.

www.westernjournal.com

Isn’t it strange how all these excess deaths started during the lockdowns and excess deaths seemed to rise in high correlation to the covid vaccines rollout? There’s graphs showing the timing of when each covid shot and booster was made available in some countries, where excessive deaths happen right after each new covid shot approval, such as boosters.

I mean, the lockdowns caused all sorts of health problems, but the correlation between the vaccines being given to a population and that population then having excessive deaths right after is problematic. It might have something to do with all this government ran depopulation plans of humanity stuff I keep posting…

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No predictions backed by fact are not wishing thinking and hoping. The whole insurance industry is built on the ability to accurately forecast - again I give you actuary tables. On a more intrinsic level humans do this all time - for example we'll avoid certain roads/routes when driving because they're more likely to have traffic or accidents.

The gambling industry is another example.
Somehow, the house manages to come out ahead with consistency.
Pure luck and coincidence? Yeah, right.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Gee idk



Rob, that’s a retarded comparison.

The 1st Amendment is the 1st Amendment.

If you think it allows people to say anything they want with impunity, then it doesn't matter if they are spreading dangerous disinformation about COVID, yelling "fire!"in a crowded theater, or "I'm going to blow this place up" in an airport.

If you think the comparison is invalid, then you need to read up more on rights, the constitution, and statute.
They're all designed to regard similar situations similarly, not pick and choose based on whether you want them to apply or not.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

That spreading anti-vax information isn't acceptable.

No, why would you say that? Have I ever said anything that implies I would restrict people's freedom of speech?

Gee idk

When you took exception with the CDC director going on MSNBC and saying "Get the shot and you won't get Covid," was I supposed to assume you wanted to restrict her right to free speech? I've posted several times that youtube, et al should not have deplatformed anti-vaxxers. Say what you will about the shytshow that is the Thunderdome, at least nobody's free expression is being restricted.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

When you took exception with the CDC director going on MSNBC and saying "Get the shot and you won't get Covid," was I supposed to assume you wanted to restrict her right to free speech? I've posted several times that youtube, et al should not have deplatformed anti-vaxxers. Say what you will about the shytshow that is the Thunderdome, at least nobody's free expression is being restricted.

Nah, I want federal employees to not lie, but that's a fantasy lol. I want her to be punished for lying, as well as many others who we are supposed to view as trustworthy authorities. Rand Paul gave a criminal referral for Fauci to be prosecuted for lying about GOF research funding to congress, but I doubt the Biden DOJ is going to do anything about it; I guess time will tell.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nah, I want federal employees to not lie, but that's a fantasy lol. I want her to be punished for lying, as well as many others who we are supposed to view as trustworthy authorities. Rand Paul gave a criminal referral for Fauci to be prosecuted for lying about GOF research funding to congress, but I doubt the Biden DOJ is going to do anything about it; I guess time will tell.

yet when Trump gets indicted, you claim it's just a faked witch hunt.
So which is it: You want Federal Employees to do the right thing, or you don't?

Much like the 1A, you can't have it both ways.

As for Rand Paul the self-certified opthalmologist, he can make any criminal referral he wants. That doesn't mean he is right. The burden of proof is what matters.
What is his proof that Fauci lied to congress about the funding? Remember, just because he made the claim, does not mean it is FACT.
Can you show the proof? Maybe provide and excerpt instead of just a link to some conspiracy fantasy website like ZeroHedge.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I would probably end the relationship with her. If she's throwing cans at me for a reason other than self-defense, she obviously has control issues. I'd be worried about waking up with a slit throat.

Which, oddly enough, just happened to the guy one of my relatives bought his house from 2 years ago, Wife went off her meds and sliced his throat while sleeping. While cops and EMTs were tending to the guy, she tried to hang herself in another room they had put her in.

And, how did you know my philosophy, and want to "point out" my "bullshit" before I even posted it in my response?
Are you one of those psychics that you also claim to be bullshit?

So you would respond to an already, clearly mentally unstable woman showing no self control with... "I wanna break up".

As far as you philosophy, when I ask if you had friends you said they did and share your philosophy of making people regret doing you wrong. Did you forget you wrote that?

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

“Insurance companies may be filing lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers in the near future.

So says one of the country’s top epidemiologists, Harvey Risch of Yale University.”

“The first of these statements came from OneAmerica CEO Scott Davison.

Davison claimed that a “one-in-200-year catastrophe” had been caused by death rates rising to 40 percent, an “unheard of” level according to him, Just the News reported.

“In addition, Davison noted that “most claims aren’t filed as COVID-related deaths.””

“In order to make up for this cost, insurers, rightly or wrongly, may be looking at the impact of COVID vaccines may or may not have had on the general public.”

Top Epidemiologist Expects Insurance Companies to Sue Vaccine Makers Over 'Early' and 'Unexpected' Deaths

A top epidemiologist from Yale University claims that insurers will soon seek to sue various COVID vaccine manufacturers.

www.westernjournal.com

Isn’t it strange how all these excess deaths started during the lockdowns and excess deaths seemed to rise in high correlation to the covid vaccines rollout? There’s graphs showing the timing of when each covid shot and booster was made available in some countries, where excessive deaths happen right after each new covid shot approval, such as boosters.

I mean, the lockdowns caused all sorts of health problems, but the correlation between the vaccines being given to a population and that population then having excessive deaths right after is problematic. It might have something to do with all this government ran depopulation plans of humanity stuff I keep posting…

How are they going to sue when the Fed gov't gave the drug companies immunity? Good luck with that lawsuit.

The correlation between excess deaths and vaccination doesn't prove causality it proves coincidence. You have to isolate for variables. For example, a lot of medical care was postponed during the pandemic, so that would be a cause for excess death. There is a higher level of distrust of the healthcare industry now, which would lead to postponed/ignore medical treatment and excess death (assuming you don't believe the healthcare industry is on the depopulation program). Without looking it up, I assume ******* rates are still higher than normal. Street racing and aggressive driving are way up in my neck of the woods - not sure if that's a national trend, but it sure is creating excess deaths in the Denver Metro suburbs, especially mine.

Even after you've accounted for variables, there is a huge percentage of the vaxxed population that also caught covid, so you'd have to compare them against a control group to glean any meaningful data. Luckily we also have a huge unvaxxed population to make comparisons to and excess deaths can just be used to "double check" our work and see if there is something we might not be accounting for.

 

[djdilliodon!]

Personally, I don’t think any usa organization should fund ANY research to a communist country like China. Regardless what type of research it is.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

So you would respond to an already, clearly mentally unstable woman showing no self control with... "I wanna break up".

As opposed to laying hands on her to threaten her with my ability to hurt her? yes.
Did you think by showing her your "power", you were going to cure your woman's instability?
Lemme guess: You studied psychology extensively alongside anatomy, mathematics, and biology?

As far as you philosophy, when I ask if you had friends you said they did and share your philosophy of making people regret doing you wrong. Did you forget you wrote that?

It was in response to your post. Then you claimed your post (PRIOR to my statement) was done to show my philosophy was bullshit.
How would you have known my philosophy before I stated it?

And before we forget:

1. Are you going to be a man of conviction in your words and take my $1,000 bet regarding stats and probability?

2. Are you going to reconcile your opinion that stats are bullshit, while also complaining that stats were "rushed" for the vax (i.e. why would rushing them matter to you if they are bullshit in the first place)?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Uhmm.

Exactly.

So you put hands on her to intimidate her and show her who is boss and that you could really hurt her if you wanted.
Got it.

Is that the spin that makes you feel best?
I prevented her from taking actions against me that she had gotten away with, with other people. There was nothing violent about restraining a person who just assaulted me to prevent her from doing it again. Somehow you see that as me doing something wrong. Why, because she has a gash between her legs. Does that give her the right to do bodily harm to me whenever she didn't get her way. You are for sure that guy who ends up cucked in the corner.

Hater time is later. Usually after 11PM.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

The 1st Amendment is the 1st Amendment.

If you think it allows people to say anything they want with impunity, then it doesn't matter if they are spreading dangerous disinformation about COVID, yelling "fire!"in a crowded theater, or "I'm going to blow this place up" in an airport.

If you think the comparison is invalid, then you need to read up more on rights, the constitution, and statute.
They're all designed to regard similar situations similarly, not pick and choose based on whether you want them to apply or not.

I don't know. Yelling "fire" in a crowded theater will get you arrested. Claiming the vax would kill you in 2 years didn't Alex Jones in any trouble that I'm aware of.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Personally, I don’t think any usa organization should fund ANY research to a communist country like China. Regardless what type of research it is.

China's not really communist - they're definitely a for profit organization. And just like everything in the (for profit) USA, we're willing to outsource to China for any number reasons, the big one being $$$$$$.