What is?

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You made a statement. I'm sorry to inform you that just because you make a statement Mr. Secretary man, doesn't mean you proved me wrong. You just made a statement. I gave the meaning of administrative law which shows you are stupid. To prosecute criminally you would need to be an attorney. Which shows you are stupid. Cream with two sugars in my coffee .

Since you continue to insist on proving you know nothing of which you speak:

TYPES OF LAW

biotech.law.lsu.edu

"Administrative law is concerned with the promulgation and enforcement of regulations by administrative agencies."

administrative agency

www.law.cornell.edu

administrative agency

A government body authorized to implement legislative directives by developing more precise and technical rules than possible in a legislative setting. Many administrative agencies also have law enforcement responsibilities. ​

prosecutor -
a person, especially a public official, who institutes legal proceedings against someone.


I never once said I was an attorney, and I never once said I was a prosecuting attorney, nor did I ever try to infer either of those things. I very clearly stated what I do. It seems to be you have a major problem with COMPREHENSION, and decide to read words and then fully alter them to suit your desired narrative; here are some quotes where I explained what I do. Feel free to go find a quote where I claimed to be an attorney. I'll wait:

I'm not afraid. No one asked.

Without making it so a nutter could find out my exact job, it encompasses several tasks. I reduce the taxpayer burden. I gather and analyze data to find out the how/where/why the tax money has been spent incorrectly. And I am the prosecutor when it happens due to someone's actions and it has to go before a judge.

I work full time. I "own" via mortgage. In my name only. I rented for the first year after I left home, then bought. I got lucky and the market took off after I bought, so I flipped it for a nice profit and bought another. For every year of my life, I made more money than the previous, until a major change happened that dramatically reduced it for the first year after the change, then it continued back on the same growth path.

Nope. I prosecute. Not an attorney, never claimed to be.

Would you like to continue to post and show us what a dummy you are, or would you be willing to admit at this point that you once again fvcked up, and posted without having a single clue as to what you were talking about?
Your call.

 

[Eggs 5,000+ posts]

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think fearing stupid people like Breitbart who have a cultlike following of similarly stupid people is at all irrational.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think fearing stupid people like Breitbart who have a cultlike following of similarly stupid people is at all irrational.

Show proof he's stupid...I'm pretty sure he was a more successful business man than you'll ever be...

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Maybe it's just me, but I don't think fearing stupid people like Breitbart who have a cultlike following of similarly stupid people is at all irrational.

I think calling Breitbart stupid is a misnomer. He was intelligent. He may have pushed "stupid" conspiracy theories, but I assume the BS he pushed was achieving the goals he intended, so he's not stupid. I even suspect he probably knew he was peddling lies to line his pockets (see FoxNews vs Dominion).

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

I think calling Breitbart stupid is a misnomer. He was intelligent. He may have pushed "stupid" conspiracy theories, but I assume the BS he pushed was achieving the goals he intended, so he's not stupid. I even suspect he probably knew he was peddling lies to line his pockets (see FoxNews vs Dominion).

I can definitely agree with that

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Let's stick to the original point of your claim. YOU claimed I was never forthright about what I do for a living.
After I proved your are full of shit about that, YOU claimed I was lying about prosecuting people for fraud as part of my job.



So, I prove you are full of shit about that too.
Instead of speaking to your continued sharing of your lack of intelligence, you try to spin off on some stupid claim that I am a secretary.
Sadly for you, you are only making it even more evident with every post that you are clueless. Dig the hole deeper.
Or, and hear me out here: Spend some time educating yourself about things before you choose to comment on or speak about them? Just blurting out your feelings hasn't gone very well for you over time.
Shall I share a list of some things you don't know about but chose to comment on anyway? it'll take a bit of typing. The list is long.

You didn't prove jack squat. You don't bring forth criminal proceedings, you don't put anyone in jail. You pass papers on to others and fetch coffee. You're a secretary.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

You didn't prove jack squat. You don't bring forth criminal proceedings, you don't put anyone in jail. You pass papers on to others and fetch coffee. You're a secretary.

Stop making a fool of yourself. You made a claim and I proved you wrong. Again. Are we at a dozen times yet?
1. I NEVER claimed to be an attorney
2. A prosecutor doesn’t have to be an attorney.
3. I have said what I do more than once, and I have been plenty forthcoming.
4. You don’t know fvckall about most of the things you post here.

I’m thinking you might be getting monoxide poisoning while you are delivering those Big Macs. Do you have an exhaust leak in your car?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Stop making a fool of yourself. You made a claim and I proved you wrong. Again. Are we at a dozen times yet?
1. I NEVER claimed to be an attorney
2. A prosecutor doesn’t have to be an attorney.
3. I have said what I do more than once, and I have been plenty forthcoming.
4. You don’t know fvckall about most of the things you post here.

I’m thinking you might be getting monoxide poisoning while you are delivering those Big Macs. Do you have an exhaust leak in your car?

Show me the criminal trials you have prosecuted.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

I think calling Breitbart stupid is a misnomer. He was intelligent. He may have pushed "stupid" conspiracy theories, but I assume the BS he pushed was achieving the goals he intended, so he's not stupid. I even suspect he probably knew he was peddling lies to line his pockets (see FoxNews vs Dominion).

Stupid like a fox. I meant the bullshit that he pushed and fed people, and that certain people greedily gobbled up and begged for more.

Preachers do the same thing.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Stupid like a fox. I meant the bullshit that he pushed and fed people, and that certain people greedily gobbled up and begged for more.

Preachers do the same thing.

Maybe his followers were stupid. If he was concocting these conspiracies on his own, then I'd say he was smart, maybe a little psycho but smart. We'll never know if he believed what he peddled, so we'll never know if he really was stupid.

As the Dominion v FoxNews case is revealing these pundits don't necessarily believe what they're slinging. Take the Alex Jones case. He was claiming he had proof that the shooting was staged. The court case blew that out the window, so we're left with Jones knowingly misled his listeners.

 

[metalheadjoe 10+ year member]

Since you continue to insist on proving you know nothing of which you speak:

TYPES OF LAW

biotech.law.lsu.edu

"Administrative law is concerned with the promulgation and enforcement of regulations by administrative agencies."

administrative agency

www.law.cornell.edu

administrative agency

A government body authorized to implement legislative directives by developing more precise and technical rules than possible in a legislative setting. Many administrative agencies also have law enforcement responsibilities. ​

prosecutor -
a person, especially a public official, who institutes legal proceedings against someone.


I never once said I was an attorney, and I never once said I was a prosecuting attorney, nor did I ever try to infer either of those things. I very clearly stated what I do. It seems to be you have a major problem with COMPREHENSION, and decide to read words and then fully alter them to suit your desired narrative; here are some quotes where I explained what I do. Feel free to go find a quote where I claimed to be an attorney. I'll wait:


View attachment 47508




Would you like to continue to post and show us what a dummy you are, or would you be willing to admit at this point that you once again fvcked up, and posted without having a single clue as to what you were talking about?
Your call.

Sounds like you confirmed my assumption.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Show me the criminal trials you have prosecuted.

You must be some kind of masochist, or are entirely overconfident. Here are a few. I never said criminal prosecution. I guess it bears repeating that I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, since your COMPREHENSION is totally in the shitter.
Would you like to keep losing and making even more of a fool of yourself?

https://mn.gov/dhs-stat/fair-hearings/DQ198014_Redacted.pdf

ShieldSquare Captcha

Still find it all too hard to comprehend? Let me know.
I'm betting a nickel that you will avoid having to admit you once again screwed up, presumably by continuing to call me a liar, or tell be to go eat diicks, or that I blow dudes for rent, or some other low-intelligence tactic to dance away from the truth.

I've proved you unequivocally wrong the last three times your were dumb enough to challenge me, but I can almost guarantee you will deny it.
Go.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Show me the criminal trials you have prosecuted.

FYI, you don't have to be an attorney to prosecute or defend a court case. The gov't can't afford to pay an attorney to after somebody who committed $500-1000 in tax or welfare fraud. I'd imagine anything below $10-20k and attorneys don't get involved. And given we're talking welfare fraud, I'd imagine most the cases are pretty small.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

You must be some kind of masochist, or are entirely overconfident. Here are a few. I never said criminal prosecution. I guess it bears repeating that I AM NOT AN ATTORNEY, since your COMPREHENSION is totally in the shitter.
Would you like to keep losing and making even more of a fool of yourself?

https://mn.gov/dhs-stat/fair-hearings/DQ198014_Redacted.pdf

ShieldSquare Captcha

View attachment 47515
View attachment 47520View attachment 47521View attachment 47522View attachment 47523View attachment 47524



Still find it all too hard to comprehend? Let me know.
I'm betting a nickel that you will avoid having to admit you once again screwed up, presumably by continuing to call me a liar, or tell be to go eat diicks, or that I blow dudes for rent, or some other low-intelligence tactic to dance away from the truth.

I've proved you unequivocally wrong the last three times your were dumb enough to challenge me, but I can almost guarantee you will deny it.
Go.

Looks like a denial to me. How much jail time did this person get for getting denied?