What is?

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Why did the plaintiffs settle out of court. maybe they knew Trump wasn't so guilty....

The evidence was overwhelming and the Trumps promised not to discriminate anymore. That's pretty much an admission of guilt.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Because he did a lot of shitt wrong that night. I don't care about the records of the guys he murdered. He didn't know their records when he was killing them. I guess that you are ok with the video of him beating up a girl weeks earlier. I'm glad it wasn't your sister or daughter. He's a thug and got away with it on technicalities and the prosecution ******.

So you (like trump) believe somebody acquitted is guilty...awkward...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Rittenhouse was blasted all over social media with calls for conviction on 1st degree murder and the death sentence...even after being acquitted...Jerry nadler try convincing the doj to pursue charges...biden even implied Rittenhouse was a white supremacist on the campaign trail...yeah nobody made the situation any tougher for him...

I never heard one person ask for the death penalty for him. Please provide some proof of what you say. Rittenhouse will never have to work a day in his life now. We all know that.

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

So you (like trump) believe somebody acquitted is guilty...awkward...

DNA is a different ballgame. Subjective decisions and a bad prosecution is different. Do you think O.J. didn't do it?

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

DNA is a different ballgame. Subjective decisions and a bad prosecution is different. Do you think O.J. didn't do it?

So you're cherry picking what makes a believable acquittal...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

So you're cherry picking what makes a believable acquittal...

Do you think that OJ didn't do it? A perfect example of overwhelming evidence and a bad prosecution. Can you answer the question? The Central Park Five should've never been charged. Big difference.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Do you think that OJ didn't do it? A perfect example of overwhelming evidence and a bad prosecution. Can you answer the question? The Central Park Five should've never been charged. Big difference.

What was the overwhelming evidence against Rittenhouse?

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

What was the overwhelming evidence against Rittenhouse?

Can you answer the question I asked you first? You are never supposed to answer a question with a question.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Nope...trying to compare oj's case to Rittenhouse is a bs diversion tactic

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

What was the overwhelming evidence against Rittenhouse?

Did he have the gun illegally because he was underage? Yes
Was he in his State? No
Did the first guy have a gun or hit him? No
Should he have even been there? No
Did he own any of the businesses that he was supposedly protecting? No
Was he even an employee of any of the businesses that he was protecting? No
Did his relatives own any of the businesses that he was supposedly protecting? No
Did anybody have a gun that he killed? No

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

https://news.yahoo.com/kyle-rittenhouse-didnt-illegally-bring-043226324.html

Wasn't illegally possessed...

More than a dozen video clips were played during Kyle Rittenhouse's trial last week. Here's what they showed | CNN

More than a dozen video clips were entered into evidence during the first week of Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin, as prosecutors and defense attorneys pieced together a chaotic night that turned deadly.

www.cnn.com

Rittenhouse was clearly acting in self defense...

Rittenhouse had as much right to be there as anybody else...he was within the law possessing and carrying the rifle...did any of the people who were destroying stuff own any of those businesses...one of them men that were shot had a pistol...Rittenhouse justifiably felt that he was in danger...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

https://news.yahoo.com/kyle-rittenhouse-didnt-illegally-bring-043226324.html

Wasn't illegally possessed...

More than a dozen video clips were played during Kyle Rittenhouse's trial last week. Here's what they showed | CNN

More than a dozen video clips were entered into evidence during the first week of Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial in Kenosha, Wisconsin, as prosecutors and defense attorneys pieced together a chaotic night that turned deadly.

www.cnn.com

Rittenhouse was clearly acting in self defense...

Rittenhouse had as much right to be there as anybody else...he was within the law possessing and carrying the rifle...did any of the people who were destroying stuff own any of those businesses...one of them men that were shot had a pistol...Rittenhouse justifiably felt that he was in danger...

Was he even in the state where he lived? Was he there after his curfew? What stuff did those people destroy? Please elaborate on all the damage that they did. I'll wait.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

Was he even in the state where he lived? Was he there after his curfew? What stuff did those people destroy? Please elaborate on all the damage that they did. I'll wait.

Where he lives has no bearing on where he has every right to be...the curfew meant nothing considering how many people were on the streets...

 

[Bobbytwonames 5,000+ posts]

Where he lives has no bearing on where he has every right to be...the curfew meant nothing considering how many people were on the streets...

It does if he is underage. He shouldn't even have been there. Just because a thousand 21 year olds are drinking that doesn't make it legal for one 20 year old to drink. Let's be real. You know that man. You are smarter than that.

 

[spokey9 5,000+ posts]

No...You're just reaching for someway He can be guilty...but you chastise Trump for having similar thoughts about a different case...