What is?

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Yeah because he couldn't comprehend anything so he went on a rant.

Not quite, he's brought up the issue of money flowing from blue states to red states a few times before this boondoggle.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“assistance - the provision of money, resources, or information to help someone”

Do you have a different definition when talking about a state getting more back from the federal government than it gives to the federal government?

What else would you call such a monetary transfer?

List of funds, with five indicators of how they are determined.

Most Federally Dependent States in 2024 - A Complete Rundown

Read on to discover the most federally dependent states, which states have the most welfare users, where most federal funding goes, and more.

balancingeverything.com

Seriously?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Not quite, he's brought up the issue of money flowing from blue states to red states a few times before this boondoggle.

Which was not the topic when I ask him the question. Whatever.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Which was not the topic when I ask him the question. Whatever.

“Whatever” meaning: “I am unable to back up my verbal diarrhea with ANY proof, do I will dance around like cat on a hot tin roof, avoiding having to prove anything”.

And the imbalance of money flowing to red vs blue states absolutely WAS the topic. I VERY specifically talked about it AND the list of states.

You asked the question WELL after I posted this:

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Seriously?

Dead serious.
What is YOUR definition of money that is given to a state by the feds in excess of the money received FROM that state?

Is this whole discussion actually just beyond your ability to understand and intelligently discuss? Feel free to say it is and I will understand.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

“Whatever” meaning: “I am unable to back up my verbal diarrhea with ANY proof, do I will dance around like cat on a hot tin roof, avoiding having to prove anything”.

And the imbalance of money flowing to red vs blue states absolutely WAS the topic. I VERY specifically talked about it AND the list of states.

Meaning you are not going to engage me in what I ask you but instead will continue to ignore it and talk about what you want because you are too ignorant to respond to my topic.

Secretary.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

Dead serious.
What is YOUR definition of money that is given to a state by the feds in excess of the money received FROM that state?

Is this whole discussion actually just beyond your ability to understand and intelligently discuss? Feel free to say it is and I will understand.

No it is beyond your ability to have a conversation that you didn't choose. Not once was my topic about states getting federal money. Mine was about citizens getting assistance from the government. So, continue to talk with yourself about the topic you chose because you can't comprehend enough to speak to my topic.

Secretary.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

No it is beyond your ability to have a conversation that you didn't choose. Not once was my topic about states getting federal money. Mine was about citizens getting assistance from the government. So, continue to talk with yourself about the topic you chose because you can't comprehend enough to speak to my topic.

Secretary.

you do one of two things when you get a factual answer:
You claim it is is faked in some way (such as economy statistics from 1947 forward being a scam).
You claim the fact was “specially chosen” only to fit a narrative (such as “picking the definition that suits” someone’s needs).

In the meantime, you NEVER provide proof to back up what you say. I’ll beck I can name 30+ incorrect claims you have made or beliefs/feelings/opinions you have expressed that you cannot support with fact, and that have been proved wrong. Yet, you hang onto them like a cat refusing to let go of its catnip.

Why?

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

you do one of two things when you get a factual answer:
You claim it is is faked in some way (such as economy statistics from 1947 forward being a scam).
You claim the fact was “specially chosen” only to fit a narrative (such as “picking the definition that suits” someone’s needs).

In the meantime, you NEVER provide proof to back up what you say. I’ll beck I can name 30+ incorrect claims you have made or beliefs/feelings/opinions you have expressed that you cannot support with fact, and that have been proved wrong. Yet, you hang onto them like a cat refusing to let go of its catnip.

Why?

Stupid... I don't have to back up what you claim I said if I never actually make the claim. You are the one saying shit for me then claiming I said it. Go stick your head up a cows asss.

Secretary.

 

[Jimi77 Premium Member]

Meaning you are not going to engage me in what I ask you but instead will continue to ignore it and talk about what you want because you are too ignorant to respond to my topic.

Secretary.

Nobody ever said SNAP recipients were "red."

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Stupid... I don't have to back up what you claim I said if I never actually make the claim. You are the one saying shit for me then claiming I said it. Go stick your head up a cows asss.

Secretary.

I’ve only ever asked you to prove your own claims. A TON of them. The list in my head is surprisingly long.

But as if you are following a playbook, you yet again dance away from having to back up ANYTHING you say. Because, you know, “It’s fact because Thxone has SAID it’s fact”. Like an entitled little brat who was never told no by mommy and daddy.
Participation trophy winner.

 

[RobGMN Premium Member]

Nobody ever said SNAP recipients were "red."

Thxone interpreted it that way, therefore it was said. If Thx says it, or feels/believes/opines it, then it is fact.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I’ve only ever asked you to prove your own claims. A TON of them. The list in my head is surprisingly long.

But as if you are following a playbook, you yet again dance away from having to back up ANYTHING you say. Because, you know, “It’s fact because Thxone has SAID it’s fact”. Like an entitled little brat who was never told no by mommy and daddy.
Participation trophy winner.

And now you are in your playbook. "Because I said so" "Entitled Brat" "Mommy and Daddy never said no" "Participation trophy" Demanding people back up opinions, things they never said, things you said they said.

You told me to back up a claim stating that I said Red states were really Blue states. Show me where I made that claim? You can't because I never said it. You are a full on mental retard.

Secretary.

 

[ThxOne Premium Member]

I will close this chapter for Rob. Those Red states that you call "welfare states" are such because of the Democratic population in those Red states that are using more assistance than anyone else in that state causing that Republican state to get more than it gives, in your words, to the government. They are "welfare states" because of your political party.

Since you are a claimed welfare fraud chaser, why don't you explain why Democrats deposit themselves into Republican states and use the most assistance? You going to break it down for us by Race, Age? I will.

Seniors use the most and they vote mostly Democrat
Low income comes in second, these are Black Americans who vote mostly Democrat

These are verifiable via Rob's Google searches.

Like I said, assigning a color to the state is misleading as to who is using the most assistance just because that state votes Red. Ignorant people will look at this metric and say Republicans get more assistance which is false. It should be clarified that Republican states get more assistance because of their Democratic populations.

 

[Buck 5,000+ posts]

GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your risk of dying

This is why the CDC has NEVER used the Medicare data to prove the vaccines are safe. And this is why NOBODY in mainstream medicine wants you to see this data. EVER. They ALL want it hidden. FOREVER.

stevekirsch.substack.com