What is?

[ThxOne]

You rely on your personal feelings as if they are fact ms too often. I actually converse off-board with a number of people here.
Pat yourself on the back for staying here and being the butt of the joke all the time.

As if I give a **** what you, Bobbytwintitties and others have to say. Clown.

 

[Jimi77]

Believe the early 2022 They government was withholding from Florida and other states, can’t remember why but was politically motivated. Shortly after iwas removed citing was not effective or consistent? Go figure

You mean this:

In light of the most recent information and data available, today, the FDA revised the authorizations for two monoclonal antibody treatments – bamlanivimab and etesevimab (administered together) and REGEN-COV (casirivimab and imdevimab) – to limit their use to only when the patient is likely to have been infected with or exposed to a variant that is susceptible to these treatments.

Because data show these treatments are highly unlikely to be active against the omicron variant, which is circulating at a very high frequency throughout the United States, these treatments are not authorized for use in any U.S. states, territories, and jurisdictions at this time. In the future, if patients in certain geographic regions are likely to be infected or exposed to a variant that is susceptible to these treatments, then use of these treatments may be authorized in these regions.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Limits Use of Certain Monoclonal Antibodies to Treat COVID-19 Due to the Omicron Variant

The FDA revised the authorizations for two monoclonal antibody treatments to limit their use due to the omicron variant.

www.fda.gov

What was the political motivation - kill non-vaxxers?

 

[RobGMN]

Yawn.

As usual. The truth bores you. You have no interest in it at all.

 

[RobGMN]

As if I give a **** what you, Bobbytwintitties and others have to say. Clown.

You don't give a **** what ANYONE has to say.
You do all your own research, right?

 

[Jimi77]

You don't give a **** what ANYONE has to say.
You do all your own research, right?

The research only counts if you were actually there to witness it in person.

 

[RobGMN]

The research only counts if you were actually there to witness it in person.

If facts discovered by other people are not acceptable to him, then even if I discovered my own facts through scientific research, it would not be acceptable because I am "other people".

He has basically demanded something that he would not accept even if I DID provide it.

 

[metalheadjoe]

Believe the early 2022 They government was withholding from Florida and other states, can’t remember why but was politically motivated. Shortly after iwas removed citing was not effective or consistent? Go figure

Iirc, Florida was the first state to see the value in monoclonal antibodies, so they were getting a lot of them. The fed gov caught on and decided to ration among all states rather than letting Florida maintain its use level.

Edit: didn't mean to quote you Slug.

 

[Jimi77]

If facts discovered by other people are not acceptable to him, then even if I discovered my own facts through scientific research, it would not be acceptable because I am "other people".

He has basically demanded something that he would not accept even if I DID provide it.

LOL- interesting point. By that standard nobody knows anything about anything. I'm going to stop sending my kids. Stupid teachers teaching "third party" info to my kids.

It's black history month and they're teaching about MLK's assassination, Rosa Parks on the bus & slavery. Can we be certain that any of these events even happened? I wasn't there? Even the people who witnessed MLK's assassination, did they verify the dental records personally?

Lots of questions, but no real confirmation.

 

[ThxOne]

As usual. The truth bores you. You have no interest in it at all.

I have no interest in YOU at all.

 

[ThxOne]

You don't give a **** what ANYONE has to say.
You do all your own research, right?

We weren't talking about research. I was responding to your petty attempt to make me feel some sort of way about your claim of off board conversation to wit I am the running joke somehow. If you like I can dumb it down for you. I don't care. I am not here for popularity or to please anyone. Clear enough?

 

[RobGMN]

We weren't talking about research. I was responding to your petty attempt to make me feel some sort of way about your claim of off board conversation to wit I am the running joke somehow. If you like I can dumb it down for you. I don't care. I am not here for popularity or to please anyone. Clear enough?

You misunderstood. You are a running joke on the board.

“In a verbal society, such as the human one, physical aggression is less often used to settle issues of status: These are mostly deferred to verbal interactions. An insult can thus be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter.”
“The pecking-order logic of insults means that if the recipient is shamed, then the insulter rises in status relative to the victim: The insulter is the one doing the pecking rather than getting pecked.”

Your incessant failed attempts at insulting others is an attempt to raise your social status. To wit: POPULARITY.

 

[ThxOne]

You misunderstood. You are a running joke on the board.

“In a verbal society, such as the human one, physical aggression is less often used to settle issues of status: These are mostly deferred to verbal interactions. An insult can thus be interpreted as an attempt to reduce the social status of the recipient and raise the relative status of the insulter.”
“The pecking-order logic of insults means that if the recipient is shamed, then the insulter rises in status relative to the victim: The insulter is the one doing the pecking rather than getting pecked.”

Your incessant failed attempts at insulting others is an attempt to raise your social status. To wit: POPULARITY.

Good thing we aren't in school huh dumbass. Here is yet another post you make that because you say it, that is the way it is. I don't care about being popular even if you have an obsession with status. There is a reason YOU bounce around from forum to forum and I have read your post on several. You are not a liked person. All you do is talk **** about people.

On that note, if you feel you have to have off board discussions about me then you are for sure a coward as are those you claim to be speaking with. It's sad that you would have to cry to others in private conversations about me. Status and popularity on an internet forum lol. No wonder you voted for Biden.

 

[RobGMN]

Good thing we aren't in school huh dumbass. Here is yet another post you make that because you say it, that is the way it is. I don't care about being popular even if you have an obsession with status. There is a reason YOU bounce around from forum to forum and I have read your post on several. You are not a liked person. All you do is talk **** about people.

On that note, if you feel you have to have off board discussions about me then you are for sure a coward as are those you claim to be speaking with. It's sad that you would have to cry to others in private conversations about me. Status and popularity on an internet forum lol. No wonder you voted for Biden.

So you try to insult people for reasons other than trying to be higher on the pecking order? What reason then, do you do it for?

Your comprehension is unusual. Since you made the claim, please show us where I posted that I am having off-board discussion about you.

I voted Biden because the economy has been better under Democrat administrations since 1947. The odds were good it would happen again. I like a good economy. It’s more important to me than empty promises about having Mexico pay for a wall, or empty promises that healthcare will be “fixed”, or Twitter wars with Hollywood celebrities, or having high ratings during a presser about COVID deaths.
It’s called recognizing what’s important and what you should worry about.
Did you vote for a wall? How much money would it put in your pocket if it HAD been built?

 

[ThxOne]

So you try to insult people for reasons other than trying to be higher on the pecking order? What reason then, do you do it for?

No, I don't. I will insult you when you are being a diick.

Your comprehension is unusual. Since you made the claim, please show us where I posted that I am having off-board discussion about you.

So you are going to say you didn't bring up off-board conversations and how I am the butt of the joke? Really?

"I actually converse off-board with a number of people here. Pat yourself on the back for staying here and being the butt of the joke all the time." <-------- Not your words?

I voted Biden because the economy has been better under Democrat administrations since 1947. The odds were good it would happen again. I like a good economy. It’s more important to me than empty promises about having Mexico pay for a wall, or empty promises that healthcare will be “fixed”, or Twitter wars with Hollywood celebrities, or having high ratings during a presser about COVID deaths.
It’s called recognizing what’s important and what you should worry about.

So you played the odds as you stated. That is a scientific way to vote. Full of facts and truths.

 

[ThxOne]

I knew it.