BoomBoomBoy
10+ year member
Supreme Veined Member
Woodrow Wilson was a cross dresser:laugh:Wilson was actually trying to avoid that war
he wanted to stay neutral
but shit happens
Woodrow Wilson was a cross dresser:laugh:Wilson was actually trying to avoid that war
he wanted to stay neutral
but shit happens
isreal will nuke the shit of them.update:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032619/#25479630
strong talk by iran directly addressing the US. i dont think any american presidency has the balls to call this (make no mistake america is the one deciding whether or not there is an israeli strike).
im expecting a nuclear iran
no im saying the second iran says "we are going to make nuclear power for economic purposes, here is our reactor and, we hate the ****ing zionists we will wipe them off the face of the earth" iran will get some nice dandy United States ICBM's.are you saying you think israel will launch an offensive nuclear attack to prevent iran from creating the weapons?
Okay CBM? I dunno what the new missiles are called. That struck in my mind. What i meant was, when Iran has publicly confirmed a nuclear reactor (that can make weapons grade shit for sure) and they say, hey Israel, we ****ing hate you. what else is new?i still dont understand. you said both "no" and "yeah" in the same comment.
why would they need to use an intercontinental missile when iran and israel are on the same continent?
invasion? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifhas it been said yet that the US is probably the one telling israel to go ahead with the war.
all my friends in the military say its only a matter of time until we invade iran. could this be the US's way to invade iran without it being us directly doing it? bet it wouldnt be too long until we had troops in there helping israel.
iran isn't the only place that has oil. I think it could potentially spark a new fuel source in my opinion. And it's not like hezbollauh, hamas, etc, etc, have been nice to isreal so far. They can take it.war? still implausiblehowever israel 'could' launch a single attack on irans suspected reactor
then iran 'could' respond with major attacks by hezbollauh, hamas, and potentially the mahdi army and other shiite factions in iraq. not to mention block oil exports from the damn near entire middle east, more than doubling oil prices.
iran's got the west by the balls here
you honestly think an offensive nuclear attack by any country is politically feasible in today's world?