Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Type R Hype
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spkrman" data-source="post: 1022750" data-attributes="member: 548682"><p>In the monte carlo I was getting 1550 actual watts - thats double the RMS of the sub. Yes... full tilt music was NOT a problem, full song.</p><p></p><p>This is extremely box dependant... dont think you can go get a prefab POS and throw power at the subs.</p><p></p><p>Now lets not talk about how the 12 handled the autotek mm4000 @ 1 ohm for burps, and the viper 2500d for music //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif</p><p></p><p>The Type R and avalanch are of course comparable, any sub can be compared. The avalanch definitely has a bigger low end, and sounds a little smoother down low... but from working with both the type R is 1: louder overall 2: better overall SQ. The avalanch just doesnt have any kick to it, the R does. This comes from someone who much prefers the sound of the atlas over the avalanch, and over the type R too.</p><p></p><p>I'll take a type X for SQ though //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spkrman, post: 1022750, member: 548682"] In the monte carlo I was getting 1550 actual watts - thats double the RMS of the sub. Yes... full tilt music was NOT a problem, full song. This is extremely box dependant... dont think you can go get a prefab POS and throw power at the subs. Now lets not talk about how the 12 handled the autotek mm4000 @ 1 ohm for burps, and the viper 2500d for music [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] The Type R and avalanch are of course comparable, any sub can be compared. The avalanch definitely has a bigger low end, and sounds a little smoother down low... but from working with both the type R is 1: louder overall 2: better overall SQ. The avalanch just doesnt have any kick to it, the R does. This comes from someone who much prefers the sound of the atlas over the avalanch, and over the type R too. I'll take a type X for SQ though [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Type R Hype
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list