THE Thread

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Chevy that depends on a lot of things. One being the driver used.

 

[Chevyaudio 5,000+ posts]

Rl-p

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Type-r

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

LOL. Are you asking what the output difference will be or the overall performance?

 

[Chevyaudio 5,000+ posts]

overall performance, and will small ported's output be greater than sealed?

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

With a larger box, normally you gain a significant boost in the low range. While upper frequencies will suffer in terms of output. Basically more low end extension. Depending on cabin gain blah blah blah.

 

[Chevyaudio 5,000+ posts]

So would a 1.7 cube sealed box get "lower" than a 1.7 cube ported box tuned to around 32Hz

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

So would a 1.7 cube sealed box get "lower" than a 1.7 cube ported box tuned to around 32Hz

http://www.silcom.com/~aludwig/Sysdes/Thiel_small_analysis.htm#Efficiency

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

One of my friends is 6'3" and 297.... doesn't look THAT big..

my tallest brothers 6'9" about 310 lbs....

im the runt

 

[Chevyaudio 5,000+ posts]

http://www.silcom.com/~aludwig/Sysdes/Thiel_small_analysis.htm#Efficiency

Thanks triger looks like im gonna stick to my original plans and go sealed

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Thanks triger looks like im gonna stick to my original plans and go sealed

Much better idea than a poted box that is to small. At least in an SQ aspect.

 

[Johnny Drama 5,000+ posts]

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fart.gif.9285a21c4a53b1a914c9dedbfcf9d894.gif

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Heck yeah. It started raining over here. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/peace.gif.2db28b618ed8d1964ebbe2f5021d2c39.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/titanic.gif.8089b7552c370bcc138aa121756d0c0b.gif

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

No rain here.

Don't really want any, either.

 

[Chevyaudio 5,000+ posts]

I want rain