Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
::TESTED:: Audiopipe AP30001D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PioneerSPL1990" data-source="post: 5604136" data-attributes="member: 604911"><p>yeah he measured with a 45 hz signal if it was more then you should be wining becouse with the lower fq his numbers were probably less than the what the amp was actually doing, just slightly. and that is for AC but thats only like a 250mV difference on the scope. close enough your test probably isn't any more than 300-400 watts off and probably for the better anyway. plus his resistance was higher than what most subswould present bay around .6 ohm-.8ohm. which also makes the true number higher.</p><p></p><p>i was told by my electrical engineering proffesor to try a water heater element for the load, to dissipate the heat and handle the 4000W but i'll have to research it and have him explain it better. he said i might be able to do it sometime in the next couple weeks so i'll post the results when im done.</p><p></p><p>and his voltage dropped, he was only on 4 ga as well......</p><p></p><p>these amps have the balls. its almost put my pioneer's VC into the magnet a couple times and that thing has +3" P-P in it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PioneerSPL1990, post: 5604136, member: 604911"] yeah he measured with a 45 hz signal if it was more then you should be wining becouse with the lower fq his numbers were probably less than the what the amp was actually doing, just slightly. and that is for AC but thats only like a 250mV difference on the scope. close enough your test probably isn't any more than 300-400 watts off and probably for the better anyway. plus his resistance was higher than what most subswould present bay around .6 ohm-.8ohm. which also makes the true number higher. i was told by my electrical engineering proffesor to try a water heater element for the load, to dissipate the heat and handle the 4000W but i'll have to research it and have him explain it better. he said i might be able to do it sometime in the next couple weeks so i'll post the results when im done. and his voltage dropped, he was only on 4 ga as well...... these amps have the balls. its almost put my pioneer's VC into the magnet a couple times and that thing has +3" P-P in it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
::TESTED:: Audiopipe AP30001D
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list