Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
T-line boxes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moble Enclosurs" data-source="post: 7469693" data-attributes="member: 634917"><p>It is a good way to get a discussion going, but more on how to get an argument going, which is less efficient. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif As far as papers on designs, these actually have a lot to do with generalization in some cases and tests that are not repetitive. In scientific theory, it is best to get a trial and error going that consists on at least 3 consecutive similar results. A lot of papers do not do that. They model, then say, "oh, this must be a constant". Which is why so many papers exist, and the technological advances in audio have been slowed down from the beginning. It's not bias, but not enough for one paper to conclude in some cases. So, I would like to see which one that is, myself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moble Enclosurs, post: 7469693, member: 634917"] It is a good way to get a discussion going, but more on how to get an argument going, which is less efficient. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif[/IMG] As far as papers on designs, these actually have a lot to do with generalization in some cases and tests that are not repetitive. In scientific theory, it is best to get a trial and error going that consists on at least 3 consecutive similar results. A lot of papers do not do that. They model, then say, "oh, this must be a constant". Which is why so many papers exist, and the technological advances in audio have been slowed down from the beginning. It's not bias, but not enough for one paper to conclude in some cases. So, I would like to see which one that is, myself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
T-line boxes
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh