Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kyle_Keating" data-source="post: 4687444" data-attributes="member: 582385">minor correction&nbsp; ;pstiffness of spiders and surrounds doest give a speaker higher power handling,sensitivity has nothing to do with the stiffness.. dynamically perhaps, but you&#039;ll never see a kms graph outside a klippel report which you&#039;ll never get from an mfr.sensitivity is simple the BL^2/re with respect to the moving mass and cone size...its important, but you also have to account for final system sensitivity which is a frequency domain issue.... inductance, system alignment, EQ... ported vs sealed, etc etc.....generally if you can get high sensitivity, and high xmax, you&#039;re in great shape.... they are typically mutually exclusive to some large degree........generally if you can get high sensivtiy, and high xmax, you&#039;re in great shape.... they are typcially mutually exclusive to some degree........</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kyle_Keating, post: 4687444, member: 582385"] minor correction ;p stiffness of spiders and surrounds doest give a speaker higher power handling, sensitivity has nothing to do with the stiffness.. dynamically perhaps, but you'll never see a kms graph outside a klippel report which you'll never get from an mfr. sensitivity is simple the BL^2/re with respect to the moving mass and cone size... its important, but you also have to account for final system sensitivity which is a frequency domain issue.... inductance, system alignment, EQ... ported vs sealed, etc etc..... generally if you can get high sensitivity, and high xmax, you're in great shape.... they are typically mutually exclusive to some large degree........ generally if you can get high sensivtiy, and high xmax, you're in great shape.... they are typcially mutually exclusive to some degree........ [/QUOTE]

Verification