Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Subs with thin tall surround and high xmax
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Warbleed" data-source="post: 2817109" data-attributes="member: 549898"><p>The xmax number you are referring to was from the B series 9500 that got DUMAX'd. The current models have about 19-20mm xmax. They are not underhung, they are overhung, LGLC style drivers. The 9100 was the only DD driver that was underhung, and the 9000 was evenhung at one point. The Voice Coil Overhang method {(VC length - gap height) / 2} is not a very accurate xmax method for most drivers, especially for LGLC style drivers, as their actual xmax (70% BL) is significantly higher than VC overhang, but its not as high as DD wants you to believe it is. The 8mm in gap bullshit that they list is an arbitrary joke, that no person educated on the subject would EVER take seriously. Hence you only see ignorant people and/or retards actually taking it seriously.</p><p></p><p>Their xmax is still far from impressive. Always has been, always will be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Warbleed, post: 2817109, member: 549898"] The xmax number you are referring to was from the B series 9500 that got DUMAX'd. The current models have about 19-20mm xmax. They are not underhung, they are overhung, LGLC style drivers. The 9100 was the only DD driver that was underhung, and the 9000 was evenhung at one point. The Voice Coil Overhang method {(VC length - gap height) / 2} is not a very accurate xmax method for most drivers, especially for LGLC style drivers, as their actual xmax (70% BL) is significantly higher than VC overhang, but its not as high as DD wants you to believe it is. The 8mm in gap bullshit that they list is an arbitrary joke, that no person educated on the subject would EVER take seriously. Hence you only see ignorant people and/or retards actually taking it seriously. Their xmax is still far from impressive. Always has been, always will be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Subs with thin tall surround and high xmax
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
