Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Trixter" data-source="post: 2042492" data-attributes="member: 542668">if the amp was more efficient, it would not cause the voltage drop. so the amp getting hot is not a result of inefficiency? my amp has never gotten hot...rarely you can feel a difference after its been on for 1/2hr or so. i always thought the efficiency % they give was a ratio of power in to power out. also it only requires an 80a fuse, which tells me that it doesn&#039;t need a ton of power to produce the the results i have achieved.as far as technical terms...i lack them. but from my experience, used to run a lot of rockford amps which i believe were about .03 - .05 thd, the amp i have now seems to produce a lot smoother &quot;cleaner&quot; sound....i have no idea how else to describe it...sorry. who knows, maybe it&#039;s not the thd that i am noticing, i just put the two of them (thd and the sq i have now) together and it seemed to make sence.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Trixter, post: 2042492, member: 542668"] if the amp was more efficient, it would not cause the voltage drop. so the amp getting hot is not a result of inefficiency? my amp has never gotten hot...rarely you can feel a difference after its been on for 1/2hr or so. i always thought the efficiency % they give was a ratio of power in to power out. also it only requires an 80a fuse, which tells me that it doesn't need a ton of power to produce the the results i have achieved. as far as technical terms...i lack them. but from my experience, used to run a lot of rockford amps which i believe were about .03 - .05 thd, the amp i have now seems to produce a lot smoother "cleaner" sound....i have no idea how else to describe it...sorry. who knows, maybe it's not the thd that i am noticing, i just put the two of them (thd and the sq i have now) together and it seemed to make sence. [/QUOTE]

Verification