Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Sub vs sub
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kr15" data-source="post: 8548290" data-attributes="member: 620194"><p>People took the "as good as v3" thing and have ran with it. A v3 SA doesnt exist. Revisions are different than versions. Versions are whole new subs. A zv3 is completely different than a zv4. Revisions can be mixed, versions cannot.</p><p></p><p>The Ultra is better than the rev3. The reason he didnt proceed is because the cost of the needed coil. The prototype had a flaw with the coils. From Jacobs perspective, the added costs of the tweaked designing made it cost way more than the SA line. The v3, not rev3 that he plans to come out with is comparable to the ultra. But with the new Sa in mind, he didnt feel the need to continue with a comparable, but more costly driver.</p><p></p><p>Rev 3 =/= Ultra</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kr15, post: 8548290, member: 620194"] People took the "as good as v3" thing and have ran with it. A v3 SA doesnt exist. Revisions are different than versions. Versions are whole new subs. A zv3 is completely different than a zv4. Revisions can be mixed, versions cannot. The Ultra is better than the rev3. The reason he didnt proceed is because the cost of the needed coil. The prototype had a flaw with the coils. From Jacobs perspective, the added costs of the tweaked designing made it cost way more than the SA line. The v3, not rev3 that he plans to come out with is comparable to the ultra. But with the new Sa in mind, he didnt feel the need to continue with a comparable, but more costly driver. Rev 3 =/= Ultra [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Sub vs sub
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
