Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Moocow16" data-source="post: 175541" data-attributes="member: 544616"><p>alright, i don&#039;t mean to get in an arguement here, but come on. the difference in the quarter mile between a mustang and a supra are very small. what, 13.8 for a supra, 14.1 for a stang? yeah, real bad there. and really now, don&#039;t ya think that if somebody is smart enough to put in a 700-1000hp engine that they&#039;re going to drop the rear-end and put in a spool or a locker or something? what&#039;s the point in an 8 sec capable engine if your going to use the factory rear-end? also, i&#039;m a 5.0 guy, i own an 88 gt. not the fastest car in the world, especially since it was abused. and obviously the stock 4.6L block can&#039;t take 1000hp, hell, the stock 5.0 can&#039;t take that. i&#039;d be amazed to see the stock engine handle 500hp. but you do have to admit, there are advantages to having 32 valves instead of 16. anyways, you said you can provide solid proof that the supra&#039;s stock engine and suspension can handle 700-800hp all day long. well, i&#039;m calling you out. PROVE IT!!!! also, don&#039;t take this personal, i just like to argue. oh, and i figure i&#039;ll put in my own personal oppinion, i&#039;d take the mustang, so much easier to work on. my god, they mass produce the parts like every car is a stang. you want a cold air kit for a supra, it&#039;s like what, $300-350? mustang, $120-$150. plus i like american muscle more than japanese RPM pushers.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Moocow16, post: 175541, member: 544616"] alright, i don't mean to get in an arguement here, but come on. the difference in the quarter mile between a mustang and a supra are very small. what, 13.8 for a supra, 14.1 for a stang? yeah, real bad there. and really now, don't ya think that if somebody is smart enough to put in a 700-1000hp engine that they're going to drop the rear-end and put in a spool or a locker or something? what's the point in an 8 sec capable engine if your going to use the factory rear-end? also, i'm a 5.0 guy, i own an 88 gt. not the fastest car in the world, especially since it was abused. and obviously the stock 4.6L block can't take 1000hp, hell, the stock 5.0 can't take that. i'd be amazed to see the stock engine handle 500hp. but you do have to admit, there are advantages to having 32 valves instead of 16. anyways, you said you can provide solid proof that the supra's stock engine and suspension can handle 700-800hp all day long. well, i'm calling you out. PROVE IT!!!! also, don't take this personal, i just like to argue. oh, and i figure i'll put in my own personal oppinion, i'd take the mustang, so much easier to work on. my god, they mass produce the parts like every car is a stang. you want a cold air kit for a supra, it's like what, $300-350? mustang, $120-$150. plus i like american muscle more than japanese RPM pushers. [/QUOTE]

Verification