Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
SQ Fi vs. RE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 5291462" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>may i remind you that a solo X placed first in finals a couple years back? and yes the woofer is linear, sounds great and handles alot of power... if you want to get in a techinal shit fight so be it, but it really is one of the cleanest woofers on the market.. its extreamly over built from the cones to the motor.. sure there suspensions aren't the most linear nor the surrounds but every design has its downfalls. the 9100 is a very good soudning woofer.. i can tell you have no clue because you never heard one... people swear DD woofers don't sound good, but 1 have never heard them or 2 simply don't have experence with them in the correct application... none of them sound bad, but they all aren't made for low tuning low frequency output... one thing the higher end lines can do is blend-in with the midrange very good... they have a very fesible inductance plenty of motor strength and plenty of linear throw for there application they strive to keep mms low as possible for a given dampning and b/l and excursion..</p><p></p><p>the 9100 is a very different monster.. its a very low inductance underhung design... proven to be a very low distortion design... amoung this the cones used are more than strong enought wihle remaning light enought to keep mass down this allows them to be put in smaller boxs and tuned lower than the other lines offering a more usable bandwidth*for people who like to tune really low which the higher end lines don't really offer) a lower F3 and more output at the lower f3...</p><p></p><p>don't try to argue with me when you really don't have the experence with the driver or its design... might i add a woofer covers no more than 2 octaves out of the humans hearable bandwidth so stop with the SQ comps, btw that are so flawed its not funny...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 5291462, member: 572595"] may i remind you that a solo X placed first in finals a couple years back? and yes the woofer is linear, sounds great and handles alot of power... if you want to get in a techinal shit fight so be it, but it really is one of the cleanest woofers on the market.. its extreamly over built from the cones to the motor.. sure there suspensions aren't the most linear nor the surrounds but every design has its downfalls. the 9100 is a very good soudning woofer.. i can tell you have no clue because you never heard one... people swear DD woofers don't sound good, but 1 have never heard them or 2 simply don't have experence with them in the correct application... none of them sound bad, but they all aren't made for low tuning low frequency output... one thing the higher end lines can do is blend-in with the midrange very good... they have a very fesible inductance plenty of motor strength and plenty of linear throw for there application they strive to keep mms low as possible for a given dampning and b/l and excursion.. the 9100 is a very different monster.. its a very low inductance underhung design... proven to be a very low distortion design... amoung this the cones used are more than strong enought wihle remaning light enought to keep mass down this allows them to be put in smaller boxs and tuned lower than the other lines offering a more usable bandwidth*for people who like to tune really low which the higher end lines don't really offer) a lower F3 and more output at the lower f3... don't try to argue with me when you really don't have the experence with the driver or its design... might i add a woofer covers no more than 2 octaves out of the humans hearable bandwidth so stop with the SQ comps, btw that are so flawed its not funny... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
SQ Fi vs. RE
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list