Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
SQ component choices/options...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thefunkybunch" data-source="post: 3111072" data-attributes="member: 563903"><p>the tweets in the Z's were a little bit smoother than the tweets in the ZR's, and i think that's where boston's AMD stuff kicks in and smoothes out the response curve. the midbass in the boston's blew the jl's out of the water. them things kick hard, and i did absolutely no sound deadening in my doors! granted that was in a jetta, and them things are completely sealed up on their own, but the zr's were in a jetta of the same year so it was an even comparison between the two. the midrange was a lot more pronounced, snare hits just had that 'snap' that rings out, and vocals were just outstanding with both. the bostons just had a darker, more defined sound, while the jl's seemed to be a bit more 'airy'. now i'm not saying the jl's sounded bad by any means, they sounded fantastic. but an A/B comparison between them and the boston Z6's, i'd take the Z6's without hesitation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thefunkybunch, post: 3111072, member: 563903"] the tweets in the Z's were a little bit smoother than the tweets in the ZR's, and i think that's where boston's AMD stuff kicks in and smoothes out the response curve. the midbass in the boston's blew the jl's out of the water. them things kick hard, and i did absolutely no sound deadening in my doors! granted that was in a jetta, and them things are completely sealed up on their own, but the zr's were in a jetta of the same year so it was an even comparison between the two. the midrange was a lot more pronounced, snare hits just had that 'snap' that rings out, and vocals were just outstanding with both. the bostons just had a darker, more defined sound, while the jl's seemed to be a bit more 'airy'. now i'm not saying the jl's sounded bad by any means, they sounded fantastic. but an A/B comparison between them and the boston Z6's, i'd take the Z6's without hesitation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Speakers
SQ component choices/options...
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list