Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jeffdachef" data-source="post: 8402307" data-attributes="member: 650438">No a 6&quot; is good enough. As said again these online box calcs are not comprehensive as torres. Did you even try to download it and play with it?With an aero, you only need 8-13 SQ inches of port area per cubic feet. rather than a slot&#039;s 12-16 (normal range). You dont have to use an 8&quot; port, the bigger it is, the less bandwidth you get but you get increased efficiency. Mainly going really big with port area is for SPL competitions where you build a burp box playing a single note loud or if the subwoofer itself needs a lot of port area. This sub does not need that much, the xmax is very little, it does not need over 13 sq inches of port area per cubic feet.I&#039;ve already linked you to the proper tools proven to work best. If you want to go with crazy amounts of port area then go ahead but I&#039;m telling you again and again, an 8&quot; is NOT NEEDED. It&#039;ll be like a fart canon with an 8&quot; aero</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jeffdachef, post: 8402307, member: 650438"] No a 6" is good enough. As said again these online box calcs are not comprehensive as torres. Did you even try to download it and play with it? With an aero, you only need 8-13 SQ inches of port area per cubic feet. rather than a slot's 12-16 (normal range). You dont have to use an 8" port, the bigger it is, the less bandwidth you get but you get increased efficiency. Mainly going really big with port area is for SPL competitions where you build a burp box playing a single note loud or if the subwoofer itself needs a lot of port area. This sub does not need that much, the xmax is very little, it does not need over 13 sq inches of port area per cubic feet. I've already linked you to the proper tools proven to work best. If you want to go with crazy amounts of port area then go ahead but I'm telling you again and again, an 8" is NOT NEEDED. It'll be like a fart canon with an 8" aero [/QUOTE]

Verification